Talk:GQ (Indian edition)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed[edit]
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2007-09-18/vogue-hits-indian-newsstandsbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 22:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on GQ (Indian edition). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141101055956/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/42125 to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/42125
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Adding frequent award receivers[edit]
Hi ::@Ravensfire: ! The four names I added are regular Receivers of the award. In fact they have received the award 3 consecutive years that is 2017 2016 and 2015 and are nominated this year as well. Two of the people are very prominent celebrities. Ranveer Singh and Virat Kohli. Nevertheless I will add some citations. (Purplecart (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC))
Hi ::@Ravensfire: ! Actually Citation 13 already mentions 3 of the 4 names. So ill just add them for now. Will get back with Virat Kohli citations. He is a very important and love by Indian as the Captains the Indian Cricket team. (Purplecart (talk) 21:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC))
Hi ::@Ravensfire: ! Hope the current edit is according to the Norms. (Purplecart (talk) 21:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC))
- You need to have a source that SPECIFICALLY says they are frequent receive the award. Judging it yourself is called original research and not allowed on Wikipedia. You need to get better about your sources, too many times it's poorly sourced or not at all. Ravensfire (talk) 04:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi ::@Ravensfire: !
GQ 2017
This is GQ 2017 official release link category (Mavric) :- https://www.gqindia.com/content/gqs-influential-young-indians-2017-mavericks/
It mentions Ranveer Singh and Prabhat Choudhary
This is GQ 2017 official release link category (Artistes) :- https://www.gqindia.com/content/gqs-influential-young-indians-2017-artistes/#rajkummar-rao
It mentions Rajkummar Rao
GQ 2016
This is GQ 2016 official release link category (Artistes) :-https://www.gqindia.com/content/50-most-influential-young-indians-artistes/
It mentions Ranveer Singh and Virat Kohli
This is GQ 2016 official release link category (Innovators) :-https://www.gqindia.com/content/50-most-influential-young-indians-innovators/
It mentions Prabhat Choudhary
Im adding more sources as I am able to bifurcate them . (Purplecart (talk) 10:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC))
- That's pretty classic WP:SYNTHESIS - you're taking several facts from sources and then you are drawing your own conclusion from those facts. That's not allowed on Wikipedia. You need a source that SPECFICALLY says they are frequent recepients. Anything else falls into WP:OR / WP:SYNTHESIS and will be removed. Wikiepdia is very specific about sourcing, you should know that by now. Ravensfire (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi ::@Ravensfire: Ok. However this page lacks a lot of notable facts. But unlike the other versions of GQ, this Indian division has not been worked up. Well I will get back with better source content. Thanks(Purplecart (talk) 11:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC))
Hi ::@Ravensfire: I know it is not good to compare two Wikipedia Pages but I do not have a better way to put myself across. The GQ Australia Page has a section mentioning all the award winners since 2014 It also has section mentioning the editors. Is it Ok to mention this data. There are sources mentioning all the winners for the past years. Is it ok to add this data?? (Purplecart (talk) 11:24, 28 November 2018 (UTC))
Following are the
2016 List :https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/photos/357590/gq-india-declares-their-50-most-influential-young-indians-2016-here-are