Talk:Furrlough

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was incubation.

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Furry Low‑importance

	Furrlough is within the scope of WikiProject Furry, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to furry fandom. For more information, visit the project page.FurryWikipedia:WikiProject FurryTemplate:WikiProject Furryfurry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not the longest running anthology[edit]

Although Furrlough's run is indeed impressive, it is definitely NOT the longest-running anthology comic in print (as the article currently claims). The Dandy has been running for 70 years, and even if we don't count children's comics there's AD 2000, Heavy Metal, among others. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've cut these claims, people can just look at the dates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GreenReaper (talk • contribs) 05:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hundreds of contributors?[edit]

“

As of July 2008, over 180 issues have been published, with several hundred contributors appearing over the years.

”

How many contributors per issue? I assume they don't get 2 or 3 new people for every single individual issue. Even 100 contributors would sound a bit suspicious. Normally you don't change your staff too often. Dream Focus 21:18, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a matter of staff so much as regular or occasional contributors under contract. Think The New Yorker, which reviews and publishes submitted articles by a multitude of contributors. GreenReaper (talk) 03:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to count all the contributors listed on each issue using the listings on the Radio Comix online store. Even with many early issues missing from the store and only counting each contributor once, I came up with 229 different contibutors for what is visible. Each issue generally has at least 3 contributors, most have at least 5 contributors and some issues have as many as 8 to 10 contributors. 67.10.172.214 (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Elin Winkler 08:32, 10 March 2010[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Furrlough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130302020500/http://www.previewsworld.com/Archive/GetFile/1/1/71/994/021313.txt to http://www.previewsworld.com/Archive/GetFile/1/1/71/994/021313.txt
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101127065151/http://previewsworld.com/shipping/archive/2009/061709.txt to http://previewsworld.com/shipping/archive/2009/061709.txt
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101003191213/http://previewsworld.com/shipping/archive/2010/090910.txt to http://previewsworld.com/shipping/archive/2010/090910.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]