Talk:French battleship Voltaire/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 19:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- review
- "She spent most of the rest of the war blockading the Straits of Otranto and the Dardanelles to prevent German, Austro-Hungarian and Turkish warships bottled up." - don't understand. Is a word left out? To prevent them from being "bottled up" or what?
- Oops, fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:48, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- "This, combined with other poor traits, including the great weight in coal they had to carry, made them rather unsuccessful ships" - I've complained about the "rather unsuccessful ships" before. For some reason that's the only way to word it?
- Cut it down a bit, how does it read now?
- I also wonder about the Mediterranean Fleet, which in this article appear to be a French Mediterranean Fleet. Is this link right?
- Yes. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- otherwise, a-okay. will put on hold. MathewTownsend (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:y
- c. no original research:
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- fair representation without bias:
- fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- no edit wars, etc:
- no edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass!
- Pass or Fail:
Another nice article. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)