Talk:French battleship Vergniaud/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox[edit]
- No issues
Lead[edit]
- No issues
Design and description[edit]
- No issues
Career[edit]
- Fix disambiguation issue with "naval review" according to this
- The definition's on the disambig page, about halfway down. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Legacy[edit]
- Since there is only one sentence in this section, I would get rid of this section and put the information in the "Postwar career" subsection
- Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Notes[edit]
- No issues
Bibliography[edit]
- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)