Talk:French battleship Charles Martel/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 17:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- After Aube's retirement, the plans for the ships were reworked entirely, for the ships that were actually completed, though they are sometimes conflated. This isn't very clear. You might say that the new ships were completely redesigned or some such.
- See how it reads now.
- After Aube's retirement, the plans for the ships were reworked entirely, for the ships that were actually completed, though they are sometimes conflated. This isn't very clear. You might say that the new ships were completely redesigned or some such.
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Link tumblehome, gun turret, Mediterranean Squadron/Fleet. Ship is a pre-dreadnought, not an ironclad.
- Don't forget these.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:03, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Link tumblehome, gun turret, Mediterranean Squadron/Fleet. Ship is a pre-dreadnought, not an ironclad.
- B. Focused:
- Any range figure available? Wikimedia link should be in external links rather than see also. Explain why accident aboard Jaruréguiberry meant that Martel's tubes had to be replaced. I think you mean Greenwich, not Greenwhich in the Gardiner ref.
- Should be all addressed, apart from the range figure. Nothing in Conway's or any of the old naval journals I've been able to track down.
- Any range figure available? Wikimedia link should be in external links rather than see also. Explain why accident aboard Jaruréguiberry meant that Martel's tubes had to be replaced. I think you mean Greenwich, not Greenwhich in the Gardiner ref.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I went ahead and disambiguated freeboard for you because I'd forgotten to check earlier.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:46, 14 July 2012 (UTC)