A fact from Franz Josef Altenburg appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
In the German Wikipedia, the details about the noble family were removed completely. Should we do the same? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can't judge the sources "Almanach de Gotha" and the genealogy site. Don't know the content, and don't know if it's reliable. Grimes2 (talk) 06:49, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My suggestion: They had four children: Caecilia, Augustin, Amalia, and Elisabeth.[1]Grimes2 (talk) 07:10, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine with me. It's all correct, but firstly excessive, and secondly no longer relevant as there is no nobility even in Austria. The rules by which his father was legally expelled from the family because I married a woman of lower class (than theirs) are gone. I wonder if we could put that "marganate" in a footnote. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
