Talk:Folk Victorian

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education assignment: Architectural History[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 17 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lkirkley (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Poudretteite, Amandalydon, Joshrieck, BriannynStauffer, Ro Dereemer.

— Assignment last updated by Mpalomo1 (talk) 22:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review- Briannyn Stauffer[edit]

This article contained a lot of good information. It didn't push a reader in any way, it was simply just stating facts to inform the reader. Good examples were provided with in text links which are very beneficial. Good pictures were added, however, it would have been good to included interior images. I also would have liked to read more regarding the interior of a folk victorian home. The resources added were cited well and seem to be good and reliable sources. Overall, I think this was a good article but more information could have been added. BriannynStauffer (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]