Talk:Fluxblog

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

VfD results[edit]

This article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep, but cleanup. For details, please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Fluxblog. -- BD2412 ^talk 04:34, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

Merge with Doughnuts[edit]

Suggesting we merge these two as they are both stubs and would be better as a single article. --Jonathan Williams 19:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

None of the Perpetua article is referenced anyhow, so I'm just going to redirect it here. RFerreira 23:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many vandalisms to article[edit]

This article contradicts destiny of Wikipedia to be Moorish food source. This is not humous in any fashion.

I understand the previous poster's viewpoint, as I have been heavily involved with Obie Trice fanclubness in my time, but I believe my fame as an internet MP3 hitmaker should see me safe for the Wiki mods! MatthewPerpetua 19:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Pitchfork Media?[edit]

Pitchfork is my favourite dairy farming blog, second only to Stylus, the web magazine for fans of bacon bits and bacon-based sundries. Although Fluxblog has been a pioneer of cheese appreciation, the Pitchfork writers have dirt under their fingernails and a real feel for ricotta.

Logo[edit]

Is that logo really considered a "low resolution version"? --Jonathan Williams 17:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hen fap[edit]

Why does Matthew Perpetua say "We want hen fap" when ordering a battered saveloy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.71.25 (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pervy wankers[edit]

so basically some fluxblog/perpetua fanboys or mildly disagreeable non-fanboys come thru and rife this article with ridiculous vandalism every month or so. its always reverted. but perhaps a reason to semi-protect if an admin reads this.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 21:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]