Talk:Fishsticks (South Park)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Hello. I have reviewed the article and it seems it generally meets most of the GA criteria. However I'm a little bit concerned about the article going into too much detail, mostly about the plot summary. My suggestion is to shorten it down a bit. Also the production section is only 3 sentences long. While the GA critera doesn't specifically has a section cannot be 3 sentences, I'd prefer the production section to be longer. I liked the episode by the way. Cheers, —Terrence and Phillip 08:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I shortened the plot summary a bit; it's within the recommended synopsis length outlined by WP:MOSTV, but if you think it could be shortened further, let me know. Also, I combined the Production and Cultural References sections, which is something The Leftorium recommended in his review of Eat, Pray, Queef. I think that resolves the issue, but let me know. — Hunter Kahn _(contribs) 00:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is ready for GA. I've also made a few changes to the article.

Passed. —Terrence and Phillip 12:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]