Talk:Father Knows Best

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Father Knows Best article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Father Knows Best. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Father Knows Best at the Reference desk.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Oversights[edit]

(1) Lauren Chapin - no article, after all that happened in her life afterward?
(2) People always say that Jim and Margaret never fought, but I remember at least one episode in which a fight between them was the central plot. It probably could have been characterized as an innocuous or unrealistic fight, but they fought.
(3) Need more on pop-culture references, as there are many. Gabe Kaplan on "Holes and Mello-Rolls" has a whole long routine about the show, including a fantasy bit in which Jim gets naked and STILL has patches on his elbows. Lawikitejana 21:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(4) Could use a list of guest stars many who went on to star in the 60's and 70's on Television. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mws72 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coincidence?[edit]

Robert Young played the title role in Marcus Welby, M.D.. Elinor Donahue played nurse Miriam Welby on The Odd Couple. NBK1122 (talk) 21:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All three networks? There were four at the time.[edit]

The TV section mentions that FKB appeared on all three TV networks at the time. During FKB's run, there were four television networks, including today's ABC, CBS and NBC, as well as the Dumont Television Network.Bill S. (talk) 14:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perspective on the 1950s[edit]

Contrary to the impression some have (or choose to present) of the 1950s as being a backwards, oppressive time of domineering men and repressed housewives, even the first few episodes show that an American middle-class father would be held accountable by his wife to live up to the same requirements he might recommend to (not "impose on") his children; see the first season about volunteering. Also, even saying, "That's final" didn't mean he got the last word; the episode where a motor scooter is purchased shows that the father can be vetoed by the mother. Archie Bunker might have said "Stifle, Edith" to bully his wife into dropping a subject but the Robert Young character did not. --Uncle Ed (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Father Knows Best. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930204334/http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=4201684 to http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=4201684
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930204353/http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=5256802 to http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=5256802
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930204405/http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=5257012 to http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=5257012
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930204413/http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=5257112 to http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=5257112
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807205655/http://www.shoutfactorystore.com:80/prod.aspx?pfid=5257244 to http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=5257244
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110501135900/http://www.shoutfactorystore.com:80/prod.aspx?pfid=5257399 to http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=5257399
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111015013508/http://www.shoutfactorystore.com:80/ to http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subjective observation in Radio section[edit]

The Radio section discusses some fundamental differences in tone and character between the radio and TV series, with quite a bit of detail and several examples. However, the section has no citations (other than that related to a Robert Young quote) and appears to be based on personal observation. The section is written well and I do not doubt any of these observations, but I would like to insert an Original research template at the top of the section (if that is the most appropriate type of template), as I feel it is warranted, but first would like to invite any discussion on the topic. Gcjnst (talk) 14:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]