This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
The character is likely based on a one-page fumetti in National Lampoon in which a balding executive-type behind a desk reveals to the reader his secret identity, "Fartman", and the powers (such as flight) which he is granted by igniting his flatulence. He points out that he could be a GREAT superhero, if he only dared to use his powers in public. He then buries his face in his hands and sobs, "But I don't! Would you?! FARTMAN, for christsake!". Oh hell, read it yourself here. Asat
Forget "likely based on." Stern flat out stole the character. The intro Stern would use for the character is pretty much, word for word, the intro used for National Lampoon's version on National Lampoon's White Album and that came out in 1979. I recall being a huge Stern fan as a teenager and coming across the NL album and being shocked how he had blatantly stole the material. I've always been surprised that more people haven't called him out on that. NJZombie (talk) 01:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]