Talk:Escalator over the Hill

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Jazz Mid‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Currently, "(vocals)" is not part of the members listing, can be found in the second review partly tho. Since I don't have the album and/or booklet currently, it would be great if someone else could add that information, hopefully respecting my "cronotransductional" page structure ;) Cheers,--wolfgang 00:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move?[edit]

Escalator over the Hill → Escalator Over the Hill –

This is the way everyone else capitalizes the title of the album. Squandermania (talk) 14:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per MOS:CT. Prepositions of four or less letter are not capitalized. Zarcadia (talk) 17:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; we maintain consistent style, rather than checking sources to determine style. This is the only way to produce a consistent encyclopedia. Powers ^T 22:49, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not moved. Even if it hadn't been opposed here, it would have been a violation of WP:CONLIMITED to move this page when our project-wide naming conventions say not to capitalise these two words. Nyttend (talk) 15:36, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concept Album?[edit]

Isn't it actually more a concept album than an "opera"? -- megA (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Escalator over the Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051216093827/http://www.wattxtrawatt.com:80/biokaren.htm to http://www.wattxtrawatt.com/biokaren.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425014446/http://www.doomsdaycreativeenterprises.com/jco/jco.html to http://www.doomsdaycreativeenterprises.com/jco/jco.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]