Talk:Emergency law in Egypt

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section Extensions[edit]

I think the section titled Extensions should be merged to the leading section. Does anyone else think so? --Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly worded[edit]

The article is poorly worded and reveals a rather obvious slant against the law. This is especially visible in the section "Details" which unfortunately contains more general statements than details.

I am particulary troubled by this phrase: "judicial-system independence prevention". What does that even mean? A legal scholar experienced in Egyptian law needs to copy-edit this article. --84.137.19.144 (talk) 11:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Provisions[edit]

That seems to be a self-made translation. Is a professional translation available? --84.137.19.144 (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the sentence saying that Mubarak revoked the emergency laws on Feb 10 2011---because he didn't!95.35.174.164 (talk) 23:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Emergency law in Egypt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140919181012/http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/759/eg8.htm to http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/759/eg8.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060824203620/http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/egypt/?id=16072 to http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/egypt/?id=16072
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090518164448/http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42617 to http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42617

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]