Talk:Email Surveillance

Email Surveillance has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Email Surveillance is part of the The Office (American season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 6, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
April 15, 2010	Good article reassessment	Delisted
June 21, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
January 11, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Good article

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage / The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by The Office task force.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Song[edit]

I looked up the song, the Bee Gees do Islands in the Stream and so does Dolly Parton and the version used in the show is the latter.

Creed's shirt[edit]

I added the trivia saying that Creed's shirt is different because people keep adding trivia saying it's the same (it isn't). What's the recommended action here? Should we just keep deleting the trivia each time somebody mistakenly adds it? -- Raymondc0 18:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jim's Yearbook[edit]

What does Pam see? 76.78.50.18 03:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TheOffice(US)2-09.jpg[edit]

Image:TheOffice(US)2-09.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:E-mail Surveillance/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I made some minor changes, but beyond that, the article is pretty good – as usual, for The Office episode articles :) Great job! This article has passed its Good Article review. Gary King (talk) 20:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm getting better at this. Thanks for your time! --Mr.crabby (Talk) 20:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quickest review I've ever seen :D. Mastrchf (^t/_c) 20:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's nice to see that you guys learn quickly from previous reviews. It makes future reviews a lot easier for everyone involved! :D Gary King (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:E-mail Surveillance/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article is mainly sourced to blogs and even a Wikipedia mirror (enotes) is cited. Much of the content is unsourced. The writing of the plot summary is not great (some typos, clunky). The reception section is very underdeveloped. I am skeptical of the fair use justification for File:Jimsurveillance.jpg. Mainly the almost complete lack of reliable sourcing means this is C-class, not a Good Article. Fences&Windows 17:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted, marked as C-class. Fences&Windows 01:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hatlink needed[edit]

We need a hatlink pointing to a page about surveillance of email. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Email Surveillance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121113211748/http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-2/58601/1/16/newest/ to http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-2/58601/1/16/newest/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080421030031/http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com:80/show/the_office/email_surveillance.php to http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/the_office/email_surveillance.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Email Surveillance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/the_office/email_surveillance.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120105065251/http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-2/58601/email-surveillance/episode-209/58772/ to http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-2/58601/email-surveillance/episode-209/58772/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Email Surveillance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150427222018/https://www.indiacurrents.com/articles/2010/02/08/omi-vaidya-the-fourth-idiot to http://www.indiacurrents.com/articles/2010/02/08/omi-vaidya-the-fourth-idiot

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]