Talk:Ellie (The Last of Us)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Anarchyte (talk · contribs) 11:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Comments and Feedback[edit]
- Copyvio rating: 37.9% chance
- Half of the 'violations' are just the words "The Last of Us" so there's no real worry there.
The lead[edit]
- [...] later assuming the role of the playable protagonist for a portion, a role she reprised in the downloadable content campaign The Last of Us: Left Behind.
- I'm assuming this means; "the player can play as Ellie for a portion of the game which is then repeated in the downloadable content campaign The Last of Us: Left Behind."
- Not too big of a deal, could be re-worded but shouldn't affect the overall outcome (IMO).
- Edit: Since this has been posted, the sentence has been changed.
- I'm assuming this means; "the player can play as Ellie for a portion of the game which is then repeated in the downloadable content campaign The Last of Us: Left Behind."
Character design[edit]
- Everything is fine here
Attributes[edit]
- Everything is fine here
Appearances[edit]
- Everything is fine here
Reception[edit]
- Everything is fine here
References[edit]
- Everything is fine here
Overall review[edit]
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Reviewer Comment: There were a few reverts (good faith) last month although they calmed down very quickly. I'm passing this section because no one violated the 3RR rule.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: (Pass)
- Pass or Fail:
This article easily passes all (except for one, see the Reviewer Comment above) of the GA criteria. The only issue I found in the article is the sentence in the lead that isn't phrased very well. There is a good amount of imagery in the article, all Non-Free images have a full Non-Free template and the image of Ashley Johnson is under the Creative Commons. 
--Anarchyte 11:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
