Talk:Elisabeth Beresford

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elisabeth Beresford article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

edit
history
watch
purge

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plagiarism ?[edit]

At least one paragraph is a direct word-for-word quote -- without quote marks -- from another source; but, at least cites the source.

Would that be considered plagiarism or copyright infringement or ?

Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 06:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Use quote marks or alter the wording.Bmcln1 (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Finances[edit]

Wasn't she financially ruined by the Lloyds of London issues of the late 1980s? Or is my memory playing tricks on me?Paulturtle (talk) 14:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please find out. Bmcln1 (talk) 08:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Their Look/ Design…[edit]

The article says: “The first Wombles book appeared in 1968, illustrated by Margaret Gordon, whose work on all the early Wombles books defined their distinctive appearance” - yet this is at odds with what has happened, and as described in the article on the Wombles. The original Womble illustrations show them as portly teddy-bears, with short fur, small upright rounded ears, blunt-nosed, teddy-like faces, and completely different to the far better-known, shaggy furred, floppy eared, pointed-nosed creatures of the TV series, which redefined their look there after. As written, it could make the average reader believe that the origial illustrator drew them as the they appeared on TV. Jock123 (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]