Talk:El Tatio

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the El Tatio article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 180 days

El Tatio is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 3, 2021.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 9, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
October 9, 2021	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 27, 2018.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that El Tatio (pictured) is the largest geyser field in the southern hemisphere and one of two worldwide with the highest elevation?

Current status: Featured article

Chile High‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Google Scholar
Google

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Sintering#Natural sintering in geology|sinter deposits]] The anchor (#Natural sintering in geology) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Sources needing discussion[edit]

[1], Frontiers is a slightly dodgy publisher.
[2], press release, may be useful to indicate that there are concerns about impacts that drilling in Bolivia may have on El Tatio.
[3], which mentions native-government collaboration.
[4], for the number of bacterial species.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

[5] for a mineral deposit.
[6], for one of the earliest studies on this field.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetotelluric analysis and more Frontiers stuff Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This book might need mining but about a mythological importance of Tatio seems to be a bit unusual. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IUGS 100 mention[edit]

I think that this is a bit too much information on one particular listing. The IUGS 100 sites listing isn't very widely reported upon, I don't see why it needs a dedicated paragraph when other listings here don't need one. The source itself has little additional information for the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:54, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's but two sentences at the end of a long article - I think the fact that the lead international body in the discipline has chosen the site as one of its top 100 is notable. But by all means move mention of it to elsewhere in the article if more appropriate. Geopersona (talk) 19:44, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've done so. I think if we get more commentary (probably in 2023) about this listing, then it can be expanded. As is though there isn't enough information for an entire paragraph. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]