Talk:Edinburgh International Festival

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

External Links - I have removed the links to festmag and threeweeks, as I am not aware that they cover the International Festival. If the people concerned convince me that I am wrong then I will gladly apologise and reinstate them.omment

Erm... they totally do. See the dance page of ThreeWeeks for instance. Fest (or SkinnyFest if they're doing that again this year) doesn't seem to have anything much archived, but it covers EIF too. It's a minority of the coverage in each, but they don't leave it out entirely, seriously. I'm re-instating the links.--Oolong 00:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have ploughed through the Threeweeks web site and I come up with the grand total of 2 theatre reviews for the EIF. There are no reviews for dance (the page that you pointed to), music or opera. I can see no previews at all. As you say, Skinny has not left the links visible from 2006 to check. By the way Fest does not appear to be getting together with Skinny this year. I was a fairly voracious consumer of previews/reviews last year (BroadwayBaby, EdinburghGuide.com and the List, as well as the above plus the usual Scotsman, Guardian etc) and I remember little or nothing from ThreeWeeks or Skinny wrt EIF. I fail to see that 2 reviews (in the case of ThreeWeeks) warrants a link. However, I do not wish to get involved in a game of ping pong so I will leave them for now but if the 2007 coverage is similarly negligible then I will be minded to remove one (or both). Perhaps you could tell me what level of coverage you consider warrants a link? BAK 09:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hard to say what level would make it worth a link, really. For what it's worth, I was working for EIF last year and the year before, so I kept a pretty close eye on reviews etc. appearing, and my memory is that there was reasonably substantial coverage (previews as well as reviews) in both of these publications. I didn't keep notes though, and maybe one or both of them had less coverage than I remember. Do keep an eye out this year. If the coverage is really pitifully scant, let's lose the links. --Oolong 12:53, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edinburgh Festival[edit]

Skimming this article and the article on the Edinburgh Festival, I am confused: Is EF an out-growth or re-naming of EIF, or what? It would be nice if both articles clarify the relationship between the to events or terms. Kdammers (talk) 01:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--from the EF article "Established in 1947 as an alternative to the Edinburgh International Festival" probably a falling out, i.e. "What!? You wont let me light fireworks in my anus on-stage? I'LL MAKE MY OWN FESTIVAL!" and so they did. Rpm2004 (talk) 08:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edinburgh International Festival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox problem[edit]

The infobox lists the Director Nicola Benedetti as people. How can this be rectified? Is the wrong infobox being used? Thanks Kleinzach 11:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why have the "See also" articles no periods after 1976?[edit]

I see 1947-1956, 1957-1966 and 1967-1976. Is there a reason for not continuing these articles? FredTC (talk) 04:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FredTC:,I assume you are referring to the {{See also}} templates at the top of the various sub-sections (Ballet, Drama, etc.), as opposed to the See Also section just above the references. As far as I can see, the templates point to all the relevant articles that actually exist.
If you are asking why there are no articles on, for example, "Ballet at the Edinburgh International Festival" for years later than 1976 ... well, I suppose that's because nobody had got round to writing them. Perhaps you could fill those gaps yourself? Or post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles?
Mike Marchmont (talk) 07:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]