Talk:Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand was copied or moved into Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the New Zealand economy. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

COVID-19 Low‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Viruses Low‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 14 May 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to COVID-19 recession in New Zealand. The result of the discussion was procedural close.

Requested move 20 January 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand be renamed and moved to Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand.

result:
Moved. This is more of a procedural closure since the article has already been renamed as more of a technical request. (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 00:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the New Zealand economy → Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand – The current title that was made by Andykatib is not grammatical and poorly structured. In fact, many articles about the COVID-19 pandemic impact on the economy in general and respective countries follows convention Economic impact of the COVID-19 in xxxx for example Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, etc, even for economic impact in general like Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. So in order to make this article title more consistent to the rest, please move it to the new title. Another option if it cannot moved is all articles mentioned Economic impact by country should follow NZ naming convention. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 22:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support for consistency with other articles. Andysmith248 (talk) 23:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks will go ahead and do that to maintain consistency with other articles. Andykatib 01:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 12 May 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: procedural close. Included in the requested move below already. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 00:54, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand → COVID-19 recession in New Zealand – Following naming convention of other articles about recessions in the economic history of the United States and Commonwealth of Nations countries. CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 00:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for those examples. Are there other COVID—19 articles that support those precedents? Schwede 66 13:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Schwede66: Currently having debate at Talk:COVID-19 recession in the United States over usage if you'd care to join. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 14 May 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: procedural close. Included in the requested move below already. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 01:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was a supply shock to the global economy initiated by the national lockdowns that produced economic contractions in many countries around the world (including most of the G20 – the countries that account for nine-tenths of the gross international product). While there are recovery periods following official contractions, all content falls within of the usage of recession and recovery and all of the content is accounted for because all sectors of the economy are part of real GDP in one way or another even if it isn't immediately evident from the GDP formula itself. Any content summarized in the article that falls outside of the official real GDP contraction can fall within a recovery subsection at the end of every article. New titles are shorter and technically correct. CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 14 May 2021 (2)[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 22:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was a supply shock to the global economy initiated by the national lockdowns that produced economic contractions in many countries around the world (including most of the G20 – the countries that account for nine-tenths of the gross international product). While there are recovery periods following official contractions, all content falls within of the usage of recession and recovery and all of the content is accounted for because all sectors of the economy are part of real GDP in one way or another even if it isn't immediately evident from the GDP formula itself. Any content summarized in the article that falls outside of the official real GDP contraction can fall within a recovery subsection at the end of every article. New titles are shorter, technically correct, and more consistent with the titles in other recessions in the history of the world (particularly the United States and Commonwealth of Nations countries). CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:42, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Linked requested moves:

Oppose - No evidence that "COVID-19 recession" is a common name for it, but "economic impact" is very often used to refer to what is happening with COVID. FOARP (talk) 11:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the newly proposed titles seem a narrowing of scope, and I'm not sure putting all non-recession information together into a general Recovery subsection sounds like the best possible structure. CMD (talk) 12:44, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Mellk (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 16:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per FOARP. Love of Corey (talk) 04:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.