Talk:Doncaster Minster

Christianity: Anglicanism Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as High-importance).

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pipe Organ Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe Organ, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pipe Organ on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pipe OrganWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe OrganTemplate:WikiProject Pipe OrganPipe organ articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Yorkshire High‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Doncaster Minster is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contact Details[edit]

The address is enclosed in html tags that adhere to the hCard microformat. This is a standard way of encoding contact information within a web page that will - in future - allow clients to access contact details more easily as well as allow page designers to style the address more easily. Pease change the details if they are incorrect, but leave the html tags. Thanks. Rob cowie 12:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schulze Organ[edit]

It seems to me that the majority of this page is about the organ and the manufacturers (and very comprehensive about them). As such it would better suit the encylopedia to have a separate page about the organ, and (if possible) pages about the Schulze family. Then the page about the minster could be developed in other ways. Chemical Engineer (talk) 00:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is a good idea to have a separate Schulze page. I am the author of the section on the Schulze Organ, but did not know how to split it down. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.149.119 (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say there should be an article about the family firm - Grove has the one article under "Schulze", perhaps it should be Schulze family - with a link from the Schulze dab page and perhaps redirects from the names of the members of the family. Then move into it the matter from this article which is about the firm in general, and leave behind the matter specific to the Doncaster organ, which is appropriate within this article as long as there are redirects from terms like Doncaster Schulze (OK, I've just created that one). With lots of links and redirects wherever potentially useful, of course! PamD (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I quite agree. As is, the article is "the tail wagging the dog". The article about the church itself should include a brief on the organ, of course, but as it is, the section on Schulze is a fine and worthy article in itself.Melos Antropon (talk) 04:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St George's Minster, Doncaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321151404/http://www.doncasterminster.org/doncaster-minster-history-and-heritage/doncaster-minster-history-and-heritage.asp to http://www.doncasterminster.org/doncaster-minster-history-and-heritage/doncaster-minster-history-and-heritage.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

12th Century Norman?[edit]

There's a bit of a problem here with the description of the old church. 12th Century would be Early English Gothic, not Norman. There was likely both Norman and 12th Century work in the old curch, but like many mediaeval churches it was reworked over the centuries, and was famous for its Perp crossing tower which style Scott retained for the tower of the new church (Pevsner). That fits with an illustration in a paper by Jackson that is cited in the article, but only for a list of the vicars, not for its description of the old church. I'll work on a section with more detail on the old church, which was definitely notable! Kognos (talk) 21:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]