Talk:Dinsmore Golf Course

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 February 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph of better quality be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in New York may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Deletion[edit]

This article isn't advertising and a Google Search gets 27500 hits so it looks notable. Therefore it should be kept. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 13:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On new page patrol, it appeared to be. You can take it up with others, but I am renominating it for deletion, there are a gazillion golf courses in the country, nothing in the article indicates this one is in any way notable. A one- or two-sentence article does not apply notability. If there are reasons it's notable, move the article into your userspace, create a sandbox (see WP:USERFY) and improve it -- then move it back when some other eyes agree that it's ready for prime time. Montanabw^(talk) 05:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The third oldest golf course in the US is considerably more worthy of an article than every single episode of Buffy the Vampire slayer for example. Besides it seems to be just you who thinks its not notable. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 09:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly could not care less either way. (and I agree with you when it comes to Buffy) All I know is that as a casual reader, a two sentence article is not encyclopedic. The cites to tourist explanations give only the most bare bones details? Who says it's the 3rd oldest course? Has it gotten any kind of formal recognition of this, or is it merely a local legend? Improve it and show that it is notable for more than being old and having no water hazards. Answer this question: Is there some reason anyone should care other than the locals who hope to draw more tourists to their town? From your sources, sounds like it has a really good view, that's something. Not a lot, but something. Is anyone famous a member there?? Or is it famous for having a unique, special nature? (Maybe the land being donated by someone famous?) Montanabw^(talk) 18:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of the links is to the New York state department of parks - which looks to be a reliable source to me. And I only saw it through the new page patrol as well. It just looked notable enough for a Wiki article <shrug>. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 00:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the best thing to do is let the people who care the most over at AfD look at it, I did the same thing with Jasper Mall and apparently stumbled into a hornets' nest on THAT topic? (Apparently there is a square footage criteria that considers if a mall is notable...who knoew/?) Montanabw^(talk) 18:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Banners[edit]

Can the banners at the top of the page be justified please? Especially in light of multiple sources. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 09:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. The "article" is two sentences long and says very little. The tags, therefore, raise legitimate problems with the article and alert those who work in this area that there is an article that needs help. A two-sentence article barely makes it over the speedy deletion threshold. The tags are a request to fix the problems. As an example of a GOOD article about a golf course might be Augusta National Golf Club. Obviously, this article doesn't have to be that extensive, but tell everyone why THIS course is more important than, say, a 9-holer somewhere in East Nowhere. I just spotted this page while doing new page patrolling, and I actually don't have that much interest in the topic, so while I home you take the advice I'm offering, I'm also going to take this article off my watchlist because at this point, I'd really rather this be someone else's problem, not mine. Montanabw^(talk) 18:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More sources[edit]

From the AfD page. [1] and [2] can be used if they can be worked into the article. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move request[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalizing Golf Course is totally appropriate; just look at the various titles of other golf courses on here. The official name of something should be capitalized, especially if it is capitalized on the website given on the page: [3]. Tinton5 (talk) 01:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dinsmore Golf Course. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100118042224/http://www.golf.com:80/golf/courses_travel/coursefinder/course/0,28290,1435601,00.html to http://www.golf.com/golf/courses_travel/coursefinder/course/0,28290,1435601,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]