Talk:Die Elenden sollen essen, BWV 75
 | Die Elenden sollen essen, BWV 75 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 4, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Die Elenden sollen essen, BWV 75, performed in 1723 in the Nikolaikirche (pictured), was the first cantata of Bach's annual cycles, each containing works for the Sundays and church holidays through a year? | |||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 30, 2023. | |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Die Elenden sollen essen, BWV 75/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 21:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Lede
- Rep of ambitious
- "expands the contrast " -doesn't seem right here, try "illustrates" or "exaggerates" or something
- The contrast is given by the biblical quote, he expands the thoughts, - better wording welcome. --GA
Tim riley Any thoughts? Perhaps you can also provide some pointers here..♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think if you make it "expands on" rather than just "expands" it will read very well. Tim riley talk 17:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, tried ---GA
- History
- Delink Thomaskantor and link in first instance in Background. Also why is one in Italics and not the other?
- Linked in lede and on first occurrence in body now, all italic, --GA
- Again "expands the contrast" and rep of "The poet expands"
- s.a. --GA
- "non-Leipzig paper" -what is that? Is Leipzig paper special or something?
- Musicologists know the (different) kind of paper used in Leipzig vs. what Bach used in Köthen, - better wording welcome. --GA
- Scoring
- Just a list, not your usual summary? Couldn't you find anything in detail on each part?
- Will be a table - after Nielsen ;) --GA
- Music
- Watch ] here : chorale cantata]s
- thank you, fixed --GA
A source for selecting recordings would be useful at the top.
- Do you mean for criteria of selection? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- I mean add the citation link after "A list of recordings is provided by Aryeh Oron on the Bach-Cantatas website."
- Made the source an inline citation, ---Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- I mean add the citation link after "A list of recordings is provided by Aryeh Oron on the Bach-Cantatas website."
- Do you mean for criteria of selection? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I was waiting to see if Tim riley had some further points beyond my own but this looks passable now, good work.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Die Elenden sollen essen, BWV 75. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120510104746/http://www.carus-verlag.com/index.php3?BLink=JSBach&selSprache=1 to http://www.carus-verlag.com/index.php3?BLink=JSBach&selSprache=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Are performances on YouTube not eligible?[edit]
Would it be possible to include the excellent recordings and videos of this and many other works released by the Netherlands Bach Society? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVigm_9XHj0&list=PLecKPCyj4yRMxTujJw1hSwtFK0-KiUTx1&index=41
§ Pedro Pereira — Preceding unsigned comment added by Profesorpereira (talk • contribs) 14:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- They have been included, see other cantatas. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)