Talk:Development of Windows 95

Text and/or other creative content from [[]] was copied or moved into [[]] with [permanent diff this edit]. The former page's [ history] now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Microsoft Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Windows: Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Windows 95.

This is a reference i used for the build numbers:

REMOVED, WP admins say that it is not a source.

As for the ones that "have no info", I got those versions and installed them on MS Virtual PC, without success.

Linuxlove8088 (talk) 22:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

the only reason I can't find more info on windows chicago is because it's hard to find any info at all! own research, yes because there's hardly any info on win chicago at all. as for copyrighted information, the picture used was already in teh Windows 95 article. as for the text portion, i can't see how that would be copyrighted, all it is is describing waht each build is like a little bit. as for lack of sources, this brings us back to square one: it's hard to find any information on Windows Chicago! Linuxlove8088 (talk) 22:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

another ref?[edit]

http://toastytech.com/guis/indexwindows.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Linuxlove8088 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]