Talk:Derbyshire Constabulary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment[edit]

  • Raised to new C class, Bit of work needed to get to B
  • Needs refs improving, have fixed som EL in thext to Refs, Added fact tags to claims that need supporting evidence.
  • Could do with a photo or two e.g Police HQ, and a old victorian rural police station,
  • History is completly lacking, as earlyer comment below says
  • Layout, as comment below divional organisations hard to read, Table or list ?

- BulldozerD11 (talk) 13:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I've added a few extra details of the Derbyshire police and the area it covers. There's nothing particularly earth-shattering here, but as a Derbyshire resident I thought it was worth expanding the item a little. I've not removed (or tried to find out how to remove) the 'stub' marker since there's still not much here even so. Hope it meets general approval! Adaru 12:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quick list of things needing to be changed[edit]

I'm not sure of how the stations are ordered, I think it is by their divisions, but seeing as how it is about the stations, it should probably be in alphabetical order.

David Coleman is retiring, and so will need to be replaced by the new CC when he leaves.

Is there much point mentioning about the tradition that CCs have, which is to walk around the county when they retire?

It has 150 years police service.

There are little references in this article, ando so will need some.

It is worth listing the ACC, and DCC?

Also, I think the badge needs to be of more importance than the area it is in.

Why can't I update the budget? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.6.79.200 (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin 11:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Commentary[edit]

I've removed the following opinion from the article, where it had been posted twice:

"unfortunately like many constabularies incident numbers are now being issued so that crime statistics look better than what they are, as "joe public" would believe it is a recorded statistic, if you report a crime. But not so when issued with an incident number or even better "our system is down and we will get back to you " many a time this has occurred ,and the public cannot prove anything. So hopefully we will all get a honest policing eventually.but targets are proving a greed element to distort."

Quite aside from the incoherence of these comments (having read and re-read I still don't know exactly what the author was trying to say), this is an encyclopaedia, not a political soapbox. We record facts here, not opinion. If you have a grievance about policing in your area then take it to the police authority or to the IPCC - or, failing all else (or if those options aren't high-profile enough for you), the media and your local MP. Shrivenzale 01:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Reverted further (barely-literate) vandalism. Will continue to pop in from time to time and do so until I see some of these assertions backed up with cites. Until then I'll assume they're nothing more than the result of the chip on someone's shoulder. - Shrivenzale 17:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red White and Blue[edit]

I think something needs to be added regarding the policing of the annual BNP Red White and Blue parade, as there is usually some sort of protest that the police have to police and that is something that is unique for Derbyshire, especially in 2009 with all eyes on how it is dealt with after the G20 protests. Calvin (talk) 16:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Derbyshire Constabulary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]