Talk:Delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Merge ?[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge synonyms. Klbrain (talk) 07:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I'm not enough fluent in English to drive the process, I please ask you to see if merge with Porphobilinogen synthase is meaningful. --BonifaceFR (talk) 07:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This article should be merged with Porphobilinogen synthase, as both articles discuss the same subject. Wikipologus (talk) 04:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I totally disagree. They need to be kept separate, although a link between them would be nice. I am a medical student, and these enzymes are distinct in that their deficiencies cause totally different illnesses. Lead inhibits delta amino levulonic acid dehydratase, causing lead poisoning. But prophobilinogen synthase deficiency would cause a porphyria, a totally different disease. ````Elaine Luther, Ross University School of Medicine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frozenmagnolia (talk • contribs) 21:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Prophobilinogen synthase deficiency doesn't cause porphyria. In any case, whichever diseases could be mentioned in the same article. Anon 07:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

While I've merged the two, there is still some duplication between the infoboxes (4), although they are using 4 different templates and I can see why individual constituencies might want each of them. Consolidating them might be helpful. Klbrain (talk) 07:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Merger complete.