Talk:Deconstruction (fashion)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Copyright infringement[edit]
The Wikipedia article Deconstruction (fashion) is based on the following sources:
- Wilcox C. Radical Fashion. [Exhibition catalogue]. London: V & A Publications, 2001. 144 p.
- Vasileva E.V. (2018) Deconstruction and Fashion: Order and Disorder // Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body and Culture, no. 4 (50), pp. 58–79.
- Vasileva E. (2023) Fashion Theory: Myth, Consumerism and Value System. Saint Petersburg; Moscow: RUGRAM_Palmira. Pp. 247 – 278.
- Martin R. Destitution and Deconstruction: The Riches of Poverty in the Fashion of the 1990s. // Textile & Text, 1992, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 3 – 12.
- McLeod M. Undressing Architecture: Fashion, Gender, and Modernity // Architecture: In Fashion / Ed. by D. Fausch et al. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press, 1994.
- Granata F. Deconstruction and the Grotesque: Martin Margiela / Experimental Fashion: Performance Art, Carnival and the Grotesque Body. London — New York, I.B.Tauris: 2017. p. 74 — 102.
- Gill A. Deconstruction Fashion: The Making of Unfinished, Decomposing and Re-Assembled Clothes // Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture. 1998. Vol. 2.1. pp. 25–49.
- Gill A. Jacques Derrida: fashion under erasure. / A. Rocamora & A. Smelik (Eds.), Thinking Through Fashion: A Guide to Key Theorists. London: I.B. Tauris, 2016. pp. 251–268.
Using the source without providing a link to the source is an improper citation and a violation of copyright. Removing the sources from the references, bibliography or from the further reading is an example of improper citation and copyright infringement. Hotel de Bernuy (talk) 21:35, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Removing citation spam is not remotely copyright infringement. Stop making false claims to try to force your version of the article. - MrOllie (talk) 01:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Using the source without providing a link to the source is an improper citation and a violation of copyright. Hotel de Bernuy (talk) 18:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- The source isn't used any more. Editing sometimes means we remove stuff, that's how Wikipedia works. You can't use a nonsensical claim of copyright infringement to block routine edits. MrOllie (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- You use someone else's article to write an article and remove the link to the source from which you borrowed the information. This is a copyright violation and an example of incorrect citation. Hotel de Bernuy (talk) 08:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Repeating the same obviously incorrect statement over and over is not going to somehow convince anyone. MrOllie (talk) 13:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- As a result of your edits, Wikipedia violates copyright. An incorrect statement and inappropriate action in this case is a violation of copyright. Hotel de Bernuy (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. Feel free to keep repeating this over and over, but this will be my last reply until something with new content is posted here. MrOllie (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, as a result of your edit, the Wikipedia article Deconstruction (fashion) is an example of copyright infringement. Hotel de Bernuy (talk) 08:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. Feel free to keep repeating this over and over, but this will be my last reply until something with new content is posted here. MrOllie (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- As a result of your edits, Wikipedia violates copyright. An incorrect statement and inappropriate action in this case is a violation of copyright. Hotel de Bernuy (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Repeating the same obviously incorrect statement over and over is not going to somehow convince anyone. MrOllie (talk) 13:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- You use someone else's article to write an article and remove the link to the source from which you borrowed the information. This is a copyright violation and an example of incorrect citation. Hotel de Bernuy (talk) 08:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- The source isn't used any more. Editing sometimes means we remove stuff, that's how Wikipedia works. You can't use a nonsensical claim of copyright infringement to block routine edits. MrOllie (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Using the source without providing a link to the source is an improper citation and a violation of copyright. Hotel de Bernuy (talk) 18:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)