Talk:De-extinction

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the De-extinction article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Extinction High‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal De-extinction is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ecology Mid‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Aka "resurrection biology"? Is that a common term? It's used by the Guardian. Malick78 (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tonimartorano.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing about de-extinction of plants?[edit]

I'm surprised there is no mention of plants in this article. It might be easier than with animals and could be useful for pharmacology. Aren't there any scientist working on that at all?--Grondilu (talk) 09:21, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Although this is a late response on my part, I second this line of questioning being addressed. Specifically, the Judean date palm is mentioned as having been formerly extinct, but a specimen of this plant is currently alive in Israel. Shouldn't this at least be discussed in the article, if for no other reason as to discuss why it doesn't specifically warrant inclusion as a de-extincted species? ihatefile007 (talk) 22:02, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing back other animals[edit]

They can bring back the Great auk, Labrador duck and a few other animals.

Cloning[edit]

The second sentence of the first paragraph in this section seems to indicate that woolly mammoth as well as the passenger pigeon would have the Band-tailed pigeons as surrogate parents.

68.90.109.178 (talk) 20:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Jeff[reply]

Who could be benefited from De-extinction technology??[edit]

2604:6000:1520:202C:F434:83E8:96FB:91C (talk) 00:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Under 'Opposition', I added a paragraph of a benefit to de-extinction. Let me know if this helps!--Maddieaalund (talk) 02:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on De-extinction. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/ts-day/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on De-extinction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121006110831/http://rare.longnow.org/projects.html to http://rare.longnow.org/projects.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other homo sapiense[edit]

Is it part of this article De-extinction of neandertalian, tasmanian, canarian peoples?--Kaiyr (talk) 10:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Smilodons[edit]

Why aren't any of you going to add smilodons into this page? :(

72.223.14.230 (talk) 03:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anyone tries to clone them NatureEnjoyer123 (talk) 17:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on De-extinction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061023235648/http://www.advancedcell.com/press-release/collaborative-effort-yields-endangered-species-clone to http://www.advancedcell.com/press-release/collaborative-effort-yields-endangered-species-clone
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513035532/http://www.nationalgeographic.com/deextinction/ to http://www.nationalgeographic.com/deextinction

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needing more detail of practices[edit]

I have not edited this article, yet I do believe some additions should be made. When stating the practices of cloning and CRISPR/Cas9, a deeper explanation should be provided. Adding more graphics could help this as well. The woolly mammoth section should either be condensed or more citations should be added. A few other minor additions can be added to support the science behind the de-extinction process. Also, this article can include more species this could benefit and how the de-extinction process can benefit Evolutionary Biology research.

Tonimartorano (talk) 01:09, 9 September 2019 (UTC) Toni[reply]

Iterative evolution[edit]

When it happens, is it two species or the same one? --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please update with: "Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat"[edit]

Could you please update this article with some brief on this study (maybe a few words could also be added to Revival of the woolly mammoth or Woolly mammoth#Revival of the species)? It's currently featured in 2022 in science like so:

Scientists demonstrate limits and the scale of challenge of genetic-editing-based de-extinction, suggesting resources spent on more comprehensive de-extinction such as of the woolly mammoth may currently not be well allocated and substantially limited.^[1]^[2]

The info in section "#Maclear's Rat" is missing a reference to the study and key findings from the study in relation to de-extinction of that rat.

Moreover, the main results from the study seem to be relevant to de-extinction in general so another section could have very brief info on the limits they found. From the study (this is also highlighted in the news reports):

Our analyses show that even when the extremely high-quality Norway brown rat (R. norvegicus) is used as a reference, nearly 5% of the genome sequence is unrecoverable, with 1,661 genes recovered at lower than 90% completeness, and 26 completely absent. Furthermore, we find the distribution of regions affected is not random, but for example, if 90% completeness is used as the cutoff, genes related to immune response and olfaction are excessively affected.
[...]
a reconstructed Christmas Island rat would lack attributes likely critical to surviving in its natural or natural-like environment.

References

^ Ahmed, Issam. "Forget mammoths, study shows how to resurrect Christmas Island rats". phys.org. Retrieved 19 April 2022.
^ Lin, Jianqing; Duchêne, David; Carøe, Christian; Smith, Oliver; Ciucani, Marta Maria; Niemann, Jonas; Richmond, Douglas; Greenwood, Alex D.; MacPhee, Ross; Zhang, Guojie; Gopalakrishnan, Shyam; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. (11 April 2022). "Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat". Current Biology. 32 (7): 1650–1656.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.027. ISSN 0960-9822.

Prototyperspective (talk) 21:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thylacine[edit]

Information of the last thylacine comes from unreliable source NatureEnjoyer123 (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AprilDiamond18 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Gevanosk.

— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Ahmed, Issam. "Forget mammoths, study shows how to resurrect Christmas Island rats". phys.org. Retrieved 19 April 2022.

[2] Lin, Jianqing; Duchêne, David; Carøe, Christian; Smith, Oliver; Ciucani, Marta Maria; Niemann, Jonas; Richmond, Douglas; Greenwood, Alex D.; MacPhee, Ross; Zhang, Guojie; Gopalakrishnan, Shyam; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. (11 April 2022). "Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat". Current Biology. 32 (7): 1650–1656.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.027. ISSN 0960-9822.

[1]

[2]