Talk:Day of Six Billion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge Adnan Nevic[edit]

This individual's only claim to notability is being the child named as number 6 billion by the UN. By WP:NOTABILTY, this is not sufficient to warrant an individual BLP page, and thus it should be merged with this page. Fences and windows (talk) 17:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This article should be merged Niel.Bowerman (talk) 11:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - doesn't warrant it's own page at all PatrickAnimi (talk) 13:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - the subject is likely to have been covered by multiple sources, and is therefore notable for enough for inclusion.--Joshua Issac (talk) 19:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

This article is just speculation. It has no factual basis whatsoever. Unless proper references can be given, it is not worthy of an entry at all. ColneyBoy (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It does have some factual basis, in that the UN actually designated him the 6 billionth. It's almost certainly not true, but the fact that it still was designated did happen, so should be included. However, I agree that it doesn't need it's own article. PatrickAnimi (talk) 13:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So tagged. Discussion? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 13:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing[edit]

See WP:RCAT: "Redirects whose target title is incompatible with the category" and " Subtopic categorization". This is not an alternative name of the artuicle. This is a different subject, and needs its own categories. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]