Talk:David Tang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removing broken links[edit]

I have, for the second time, removed broken and redundant links in this article. the redundant links are links to different articles david has written in the Observer. while undoubtedly interesting, we only need one link to show that he has written this column regularly. interested readers can find the rest. and a broken link is a broken link. if someone wants to try to research and find the link again, feel free, i wont touch a working link. please dont replace the links as they existed without testing them to be sure they still work. 404 not found is not acceptable. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

broken links again added back. i think some of them have an extra slash on them, making them broken. if i could solve this, so could the person determined to add them back. thats cool. what i wish the other person would address is my statement that we only need one link to show that Sir Tang has written columns for a newspaper. adding more than one, unless the subject is mr tang himself (biography, his business interests, etc) is not necessary. a link to an index of his articles would be nice. im really not that interested in going back and forth here. i started editing this cause the article on china club was linked to a spammy site, which i had never encountered before, and then fixed that up, along with promotional language, all unreferenced. but facing more of this kind of uphill editing, where i slide back down the hill without dialog to improve articles and our understanding of what works, is reinventing Sysyphus. so ill stop watching this. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

couldnt resist, im back. i once again have removed broken links, and excessive links to the subjects newspaper articles. we only need one such link to his writing, unless he has written about himself. if anyone wants to add the broken links back, dont just restore them from the articles history, but research them and get them right. there are still excessive links here, but i left a few more than necessary to show that i am not biased against the subject. i did improve the article on his restaurant, making it more appropriate for WP. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repository[edit]

I copied above links from a linkfarm in the external links. Some may be of interest to source the article, but we are not a linkfarm, hence they don't belong in the external links. --Dirk Beetstra T C 09:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accident[edit]

I added a reference in Norwegian to the claim that David Tang was in an accident. However, note that news reports seem to agree that David Tang is 57 years old, not 62. However, the man identified only as Charles is said to be 62. I don't know if this means there is a different David Tang, or that the news reports are confused. — Preceding Kjetil Kjernsmo (talk) 21:07, 15 May 2017 (UTC) (talkcontribs) 20:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Found that the hospital has quoted the critically injured person's age as 57: [1]. Kjetil Kjernsmo (talk) 21:09, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is clearly not the same person, as can be seen from this: [2] Kjetil Kjernsmo (talk) 21:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also found this article which describes the person involved in the accident returning to Norway to donate money to the search & rescue service. This apparently took place AFTER the subject of this article had died. Citobun (talk) 12:11, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perse School and English[edit]

The quoted information about Tang "attending Perse from age 13 and not being able to speak English" is almost certainly incorrect.

  • His primary school web site states that it specialises in teaching English.
  • He attended Perse school from late 1970 until July 1973, meaning he was not there until he was 16. He appears on the July 1971 school photo, and for the next two years, but not the one taken in 1970 (I have copies).

I realise that none of the above is good enough to edit the site, but could a statement 'further citation needed' be added ? --Pteerr (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Macfarlanes Claim[edit]

I traced the claim regarding his career at Macfarlanes to this diff here, but it isn't sourced and I couldn't find one after some research. There doesn't seem to be anything not citogenesis-ed linking him to Vanni Treves or Macfarlanes, let alone the specific quotes attributed to Treves.

The original editor also seems to have a history of making unsourced claims.

Not going to edit anything yet - Opinions? 5.151.94.118 (talk) 18:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]