Talk:David Linde

File:David Linde.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:David Linde.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Article issues

The article has a number of specific issues that needs to be addressed:

• References. While some of the article is legitimately sourced to, for example, Variety, several of the sources are not reliable, in particular the three IMDB pages.
• Promotional language. There are several example of language in the article that one would expect to find in a resume but not in an encyclopedia article. For example: "...to innovate how motion pictures are distributed around the globe" or "During his tenure, Universal significantly grew its’ international distribution platform across all media and launched Universal's family/animation banner," especially as these claims are not supported by the cited source. These example clearly violates Wikipedia's rule on maintaining a neutral point of view

These should be addressed rather than the tags simply being removed. Sparthorse (talk) 01:18, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Linde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425232232/http://www.wrpioneers.org/files/wrpioneers/files/Pioneers%20Announcement%20presentation09.pdf to http://www.wrpioneers.org/files/wrpioneers/files/Pioneers%20Announcement%20presentation09.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120126200500/http://www.filmsinreview.com/2006/11/01/the-israeli-film-festival/ to http://www.filmsinreview.com/2006/11/01/the-israeli-film-festival/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)