Talk:Dallas Country Club

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We have just started working on WikiProject D-FW. The templates are NOT working. We are trying to identify articles that are needed. This is one of them. There are only so many hours in a day and only two of us leading the revival of the project. A little mollusk (talk) 04:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is absolutely no text in the article. Nothing besides a broken template which falls under CSD:1 quite nicely. I also have reservations as to whether the article would pass WP:ORG once it's created if it's a run-of-the-mill country club. An article needs to have more than a broken template TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 04:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
C'mon. It's NOT a run-of-the-mill country club, which is why it would be rated "Mid" importance if we could get a working template. There are only TWO of us working on this and we're trying to identify what articles are needed. There are many holes in the section, which is why we resumed working on the project. I put up three such articles. I can't write 24-7! A little mollusk (talk) 04:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then you should work on them in Userspace or your sandbox until such time as the templates are working. As of the moment there is zero content, and I see one other has been so tagged. Articles need to have some content before they're created "live" or they will be tagged for speedy. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 04:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We just discovered that the templates were not working. Help has been requested. Thank you for understanding. A little mollusk (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good luck with getting them to work. In the mean time there's nothing wrong with working on the article in user space so that it's ready and has content/context when it's live. Adding relaible sources will help bolster the club and ensure it passes WP:ORG when it is live. Have a good night TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 04:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

I think the bare URLs need to be converted to proper references, that may be part of it. I personally don't think the article is confusing but it needs a better flow for readability TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 02:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and had edited this substantially, however, someone else has just tried to delete the majority of the article, which is NOT helpful editing! Those actions were subjected to the "undo" command. A little mollusk (talk) 18:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]