Talk:Cyclone Waka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleCyclone Waka is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic starCyclone Waka is part of the 2001–02 South Pacific cyclone season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 9, 2012.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 5, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 19, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 16, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
November 16, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Untitled[edit]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Severe Tropical Cyclone Waka/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ★ Auree (talk) 00:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Review completed by ★ Auree (talk)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
GA toolbox
Reviewing
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Lede - There are a few issues that need fixing here.
    • ... was one of the worst tropical cyclones to ever impact the South Pacific kingdom of Tonga. - Worst, how? This could imply several things. Was it deadly or damaging? In this case, it'd be better to go with something more specific such as "costliest", "devastating" or "catastrophic".
    • Forming out of a near-equatorial trough in mid-December 2001, the precursor to Waka initially struggled to gain strength - Although I understand what you mean, this part could be misleading. Did the precursor to Waka form out of the trough, or was the trough the precursor to Waka?
    • The storm gradually was able... - Doesn't read all too well.
    • ... and 104.2 million paʻanga ($51.3 million USD) was wrought in damage. - Technically nothing wrong here, but consider using the currency sign (T$) instead.
    • Hundreds of structures were destroyed and much of the nation's agriculture was destroyed. - A bit repetitive; could be altered a bit.
    Overall, the prose is a little verbose and clunky; try to smoothen it out a bit.
    Meteorological history - Pretty solid; no more than a handful of minor issues.
    • ... twin equatorial monsoonal troughs - You link monsoon and trough separately, but an article on monsoon troughs exists, which I assume are the type of troughs in question here.
    • You link sea surface temperature twice, though under different terms (initially "warm waters" and later on the actual term "sea surface temperatures"), which could be a bit confusing. I'd suggest using "warm sea surface temperatures" or something along those lines instead, and de-linking the second one.
    • Later that day, the cyclone attained its peak intensity as a Category 4 severe tropical cyclone with winds of 185 km/h (115 km/h) and a barometric pressure of 930 mbar (hPa; 27.46 inHg).[2] The JTWC assessed the storm to have attained similar one-minute sustained winds upon peaking. - I'm guessing the first assessment was done by the Fiji Meteorological Service, and that the winds measured by the agency were one-minuted sustained as well? Perhaps you could clarify a bit.
    Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Wikify eye.
    Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Gradual weakening took place over the following few days and the system retained gale-force winds through January 5; however, its pressure continued to decrease. - This sentence is sort of bloated and doesn't read too well.
    Reworded Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I fixed some minor issues, but it could still use a copy-edit.
    Preparations and impact - Same as MH, basically.
    • Many residents on the small island of Niuafo'ou, about 35 km2 (13.5 mi2) in size, evacuated to other islands prior to Waka's arrival. - Why do you mention its size? Did it have any effect on local preparations or impact?
    Since small can be a relative term, I thought it best to give an actual size for the island as well. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, then don't mention anything about its size altogether. After all, that's what the main article on the island is for. ★ Auree (talk) 17:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • According to local reports, nearly every tree in Neiafu had been downed by high winds and "It is like the island [was] sandblasted." - The inline quotation is kind of terse and loose.
    Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • ... about 200 homes in the city were severely damaged or desroyed. - Typo. Also, it'd be better if you switched around "severely damaged" and "destroyed".
    When reading that sentence, severely damaged or destroyed sounds better than destroyed or severely damaged.Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Now that I read it again, I agree. ★ Auree (talk) 17:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Six months after the storm, the bat population in Vava'u was still only 20% the pre-storm level. - Missing a word there. ;)
    Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also needs a copy-edited for optimal punctuation.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No problems here.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Very thorough and informative.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Yep.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    All good.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captionsy):
    All images are PD.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  8. Comments:
  • Please link storm name to article here and here.
Linked Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The whole article needs a quick rescan.
  • You mention Waka passed directly over Vava'u in both the lede and the Impact and preps section; however, it isn't mentioned in the MH, which is supposed to cover any major aspects regarding its storm path.
Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In all, it's a solid article; I'll pass it once all the issues have been addressed. ★ Auree (talk) 02:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've addressed all the main comments you left. Is there anything else specific with the prose that needs fixing? Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's looking much better now. A few problems left I see...
• The storm attained its peak intensity as a Category 4 severe tropical cyclone on December 31 with winds of 185 km/h (115 mph); it passed directly over Vava'u at this strength. - Kind of an awkward structure here, especially for a lede sentence.
• ... the system entered a region which favored - Clause should be restrictive.
And more minor issues such as these; however, I feel it does meet GA now. Fix these last issues and I'll pass it. :) ★ Auree (talk) 17:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Problems met. Passing – good work. ★ Auree (talk) 19:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting source[edit]

The WMO committee report for 2002 contains some pretty interesting comments on Waka including some stuff for Tuvalu and Niue.Jason Rees (talk) 01:02, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Waka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Waka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Cyclone Waka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cyclone Waka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cyclone Waka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cyclone_Waka&oldid=1211218874"