Talk:Cutterpillow

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cutterpillow article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

I think that an album by a band that notability is not disputed is not vanity and should not be deleted. Kpjas 07:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am disputing its notability. Please provide an indication that it meets our notability criteria. — Werdna talk criticism 07:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, do you even know who The Eraserheads are? Ask any pinoy who has lived throughout the 90s and they will know them and this album, which is the highest-selling album in the Philippines (either it is now, or was for a fair bit...

That aint notable enough for you? OK.. I've just looked at your last comment and it was like 6 months or whatever ago.. so yeah. Just wanted to make myself heard.Entocheets 09:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs more info...[edit]

Since this is one of the most notable albums in the Philippines, isn't it big enough to have a few info? Joshua manimtim2 (talk) 04:36, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This album is a classic in Philippine music. It IS historically and culturally important in this country. It served as the soundtrack of an entire generation of Filipinos. It deserves a 'High' rating in importance. -Red marquis (talk) 12:31, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cutterpillow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121006004547/http://www.titikpilipino.com/album/?albumid=2118 to http://www.titikpilipino.com/album/?albumid=2118

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]