Talk:Curucuru and Friends

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curucuru and Friends. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Edit-Warring[edit]

User:Blackgaia02, User:Jackfork - Stop edit-warring. This talk page is intended for discussion of proposed edits, rather than for edit-warring. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well they started it months ago. I actually has to step in and revert everything back.--BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 02:57, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon I restored mass removal of content without a good explanation twice on the Curucuru and Friends page. Claiming it's false content is a regular tactic of vandals, or a user thinking they have ownership of an article which actually appears to be the case here. Didn't restore the content a 3rd time therefore didn't break WP:3RR. Have not posted anything on this talk page until now so not sure where your coming from. Jackfork (talk) 04:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You mean when people actually use this as a source? IMDB is not a source and will never be, its just written by stupid fanatics. And besides, you guiltily believed that the whole "STONE Comics & CJ E&M Film Financing & Investment Entertainment & Comics Cinematic Universe Manhwa" is real. No one is that stupid to believe that lie!--BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 10:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Blackgaia02 - Please read the civility policy. Simply finding creative ways to insult your opponent may win an insult slam, but it isn't how we edit Wikipedia collaboratively. If some editors believe something, and you think it isn't true, it is better to discuss the issue of truth than to insult them. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
They won't listen anyway.--BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 03:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]