Talk:Cree Wikipedia

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

redirect, 13 April 2017, see discussion.
keep, 11 June 2016, see discussion.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Accuracy[edit]

I question the validity of the "Dynamics of the number of articles" chart. The article, and the supporting source, show the encyclopedia reaching 100 articles in February 2014. But the chart shows it reaching 100 articles in 2006. However, it also shows (a) a negative number of articles during half of 2005, and (b) a loss of over 50% of its articles from 2013 to 2015. The former makes no sense and the latter doesn't seem credible. What's going on here? Largoplazo (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Largoplazo, everything is simply explained. Charts has an information from https://cr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics (archive.org). As we can see, in 2006 creewiki grew up (snapshot archive.org). In 2014 creewiki grew down, but in the end of year (Feb 2014) again grew up. We see it at https://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesCurrentStatusVerbose.htm . Than, creewiki was again grew down and in 2016 again grew up (see m:Wikimedia_News#Wikipedias; in 2016 again has reached 100 articles). Sorry for my bad English. — Green Zero обг 08:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Largoplazo, concerning 2005 - it's just a visual effect of software which generated this chart; rounding, not linear (in 2005 creewiki has 0 articles). — Green Zero обг 09:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when you visit Cree Wikipedia, which should be Cree Wikipedia since the "cr" in the URL http://cr.wikipedia.org/ is the ISO 639-2 code for Cree, the main page claims that it's Naskapi Wikipedia. Though it's related, Naskapi isn't Cree. What's going on here? Largoplazo (talk) 16:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I take it back, sort of. Naskapi language, in the infobox, shows that Naskapi is a descendant of Cree. I guess that means it's the variety that they're using there. But then that's worth noting in this article. Largoplazo (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cree language is not unified language. Cree language is a name of dialects group. I think, link to the Cree language enough, there are all the details. — Green Zero обг 09:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]