Talk:Council for the Curriculum, Examinations & Assessment

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education in the United Kingdom (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education in the United Kingdom, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Education in the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomEducation in the United Kingdom articles

Untitled[edit]

Taking advantage of re-marks Someone commented on CCEA 'Cashing in' on remarks and using very strict examiners. It is generally accepted their standards are strict, but in line with QCA procedures. Border-line candidates are remarked as a matter of course. Because of the nature of one candidate's marking being allocated among several examiners (via several papers), any mistake in marking is often in one paper and is balanced out by other papers - hence there is a low probabability of a remark changing the grade unless several examiners were all at fault.

CCEA Redirect[edit]

CCEA redirects here. Someone put: 'Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs' on the page. It doesn't belong on this page - what cabinet does this relate to, does it need an article and should the redirect change? --Philipwhiuk (talk) 23:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm looks like an Indian cabinet committee name.. I'll mention it on a relevant wiki page.... --Philipwhiuk (talk) 23:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Council for the Curriculum, Examinations & Assessment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141110201237/http://www.rewardinglearning.org.uk/qualifications/Results.aspx?g=2&t=4&c=R&s=0&dt=0&v=0&f=0&d=r to http://www.rewardinglearning.org.uk/qualifications/Results.aspx?g=2&t=4&c=R&s=0&dt=0&v=0&f=0&d=r
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141110195508/http://www.rewardinglearning.org.uk/qualifications/results.aspx?g=1&t=1&c=R&s=0&dt=0&v=0&f=0&d=r to http://www.rewardinglearning.org.uk/qualifications/results.aspx?g=1&t=1&c=R&s=0&dt=0&v=0&f=0&d=r

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-departmental?[edit]

How can the CEA be a non-departmental public body of the Dept of Education, as is stated in the lede? That seems like a contradiction, doesn't it? jxm (talk) 04:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]