Talk:Conservatism in Russia

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 September 2019 by reviewer Missvain (talk · contribs).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Issues with this article[edit]

I found paragraphs in this article not supported whatsoever by whatever references were used for them. I removed them but the whole article seems plagued by this so I'm just going to add the template for these issues instead. For example, one paragraph mentioned how Putin's government has been labelled totalitarian and other accusations, with the sources not having any mention of them. Another example is how somehow a source from 1998 is used to talk about Crimea and other recent events. The language used suggests POV pushing. Clearly there is original research, a neutrality issue and more citations are needed to support what has been written. Mellk (talk) 00:33, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another issue is that it takes for granted that liberal economic policy is a core conservative value – that only makes any sense from a US perspective, where it is an artefact of the US two-party system that has forced the conservatives and the libertarians to share a party. David Marjanović (talk) 21:48, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]