Talk:Conical mill

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 24 February 2009 by reviewer Akradecki (talk · contribs).

AfC material[edit]

The following two items were included in the original AfC submission, and have been move here for historical reasons. AKRadecki^Speaketh 21:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

In the interest of full disclosure, this submission is being written by a Quadro Engineering employee. I am aware of the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia, especially governing conflict of interest and company notability, and will be more than happy to abide by them. I'll be keeping my edits to talk pages only (beyond this initial submission) in order to avoid any conflicts. I can provide information regarding Quadro and/or conical mills as needed; I'd particularly like to have a picture of a conical mill in the article. If you wish to contact me, please do so at removing personal contact information. Thanks! 65.216.74.168 (talk) 18:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Thanks for reviewing the article: I've added more sources to the document (new ones in italics). I can supply some patents and studies where Quadro conical mills are used, but I think that might make it sound too much like a COI. And I hate to bring up the "if-that's-in-why-not-this" argument, but the hammermill article isn't much better. Thanks again! 65.216.74.168 (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect?[edit]

Could we please add a redirect from "Conical screen mill" to this page? The machine can be called one or the other, and "conical screen mill" does not bring this article up on its search. Thanks! 65.216.74.168 (talk) 13:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Martin^msgj 14:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Martin! 65.216.74.168 (talk) 14:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]