Talk:Concubinage (law)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

Every topic on wikipedia should be WP:NOTABLE, which requires multiple RS that address "the topic directly and in detail". What are these RS that address the topic directly and in detail? Dictionary entries[1][2][3] seem like a trivial mention and therefore wouldn't count.VR talk 20:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are links to entire civil codes reflecting the term in French and Philippine law. I've also seen passing mentions to concubinage laws in Brazil and Mexico, but I need to research it. Notability just requires that there is clear evidence of the use of the term out there. But yes, it's definitely still stubby. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Revival"[edit]

Translating a current law from Latin into a modern language is not “a revival”, it is simply a translation. Most legal systems of Europe were translated from Latin to modern languages about in the same period. Concubinage laws have been present throughout the entire Middle Age. --Grufo (talk) 20:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]