Talk:Columbia Law School

New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as High-importance).

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

rankings paragraph[edit]

The ranking information on the Columbia, Stanford, Harvard, & Yale (and perhaps other) law school pages seems disproportionate and over-emphasized in the early part of the article. Moreover it seems likely to encourage the kinds of disputes among afficionados of one school or the other tweaking endlessly to pull out particular rankings. I think on all these law schools that a general statement of prestigiousness & reference to the admittedly important US News rankings, historically contextualized, is useful. But comparisons b/w the different law schools are too specific for the top portion. I'm proposing to edit it down, but since it seems to be a frequently edited section in some of the articles I'm announcing for discussion here first. (Cross-posting to talk pages for SLS, HLS, YLS, maybe others.) --LQ 20:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jay/Blatchford[edit]

Although the page now notes they studied at Columbia prior to the opening of the formal law school, I think their inclusion is still inappropriate, and meant to aggrandize Columbia's alumni list and reputation. It implies the false presumption that had the law school existed, these individuals would have inevitably attended. Moreover, no other major law school alumni list includes law-related figures who studied in their undergraduate colleges prior to the opening of the school. I move to strike these references. Cjs2111 16:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I'm not sure how aggrandizing it is given that there are lots of other luminaries. (Especially Blatchford. <g>) I think the problem is that law was taught differently at the time, as part of general curricula at some schools and as part of separate law schools at other schools. So I guess the question is, did Jay & Blatchford study somewhere else that could more appropriately "claim" them? If CLS regularly "claims" them as distinguished alums, then I think it would be okay. John Jay, for instance, studied law before any "law schools" existed in the US, according to Law school in the United States list of oldest law schools. (This discussion makes me realize how historically inadequate the current Law school in the United States article is, though.) --lquilter 18:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen Jay claimed officially as a CLS alumnus...although undergraduate Columbia College, where he actually studied (as did Blatchford), celebrates him as one often. It's true there was a law program at Columbia College prior to the founding of the law school, but it only existed for a brief time in the 1790s, long after Jay was in school, so I doubt he was even able to study law. Cjs2111 18:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. News & World Report ranking[edit]

The article says that CLS is ranked 4th by U.S. News & World Report, but the links given show that it is ranked 5th. What gives? Krakatoa (talk) 05:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Acceptance Rate in 2008[edit]

According to Columbia Law School, its acceptance rate for JD applicants entering law school in 2008 was 14.8%. The figure that is currently listed is for the 2007 entering class. I've never done wiki edits before, so I don't want to mess with the article. Can one of you experts make the necessary changes? Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.199.72.218 (talk) 05:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Columbia Law School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090611205047/http://officialguide.lsac.org:80/SearchResults/SchoolPage_PDFs/ABA_LawSchoolData/ABA2163.pdf to http://officialguide.lsac.org/SearchResults/SchoolPage_PDFs/ABA_LawSchoolData/ABA2163.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060503091406/http://www.forbes.com/ to http://www.forbes.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Columbia Law School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090309093609/http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com:80/grad/law to http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/grad/law
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090611205047/http://officialguide.lsac.org/SearchResults/SchoolPage_PDFs/ABA_LawSchoolData/ABA2163.pdf to http://officialguide.lsac.org/SearchResults/SchoolPage_PDFs/ABA_LawSchoolData/ABA2163.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any discussion of programs needed?[edit]

The article does not discuss any aspect of the JD program. It has a few lines on the LL.M. program and just mentions without any discussion the J.S.D. program (edited - used to say S.J.D., but Columbia uses the J.S.D abbreviation for the degree). Rather than extensive discussion of ranking, perhaps this would be a useful addition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.201.210.196 (talk) 13:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]