Talk:Collabera

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Atalmadge (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

File:04HitenPatel.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

That file has been replaced by another licensed file

File:Hiten.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

	An image used in this article, File:Hiten.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do??????
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Collabera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111109072937/http://www.informationweek.com:80/iw500/2010/top250?qNum=2 to http://www.informationweek.com/iw500/2010/top250?qNum=2
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120401190006/http://www.informationweek.com/iw500/2011/top250?qNum=2 to http://www.informationweek.com/iw500/2011/top250?qNum=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Collabera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.informationweek.com/iw500/2010/top250?qNum=2
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.informationweek.com/iw500/2011/top250?qNum=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion September 2018[edit]

Lots of references to press releases
First three pages on google search show only one reference (2014 ) Mostly just self created links

Iwannacrib (talk) 05:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI editing[edit]

(First read WP:COI and WP:PAID if you are unfamiliar with Wikipedia's policies on conflict-of-interest and paid editing.) The COI editing on this article outrages me most in the way that it is completely overt and transparent, yet seems to have gone fully undetected. Let's look at the five users who have contributed more than 5% of the article's current text (this shows the figures, but for the latest version only). Half of the content comes from MushuNeak, a banned COI/PAID editor. Why were they editing this particular page, I wonder? Then we have Barsantanu, Strata82 and Punkil.patel, who are clearly single-purpose accounts aiming to promote this company, with what looks pretty uncontroversially like COIs to me. Last is WikHead, with 5.1% of contributed text, a prolific editor who just made uncontroversial reference improvements, included for full transparency.

Because of these violations of Wikipedia's policies, guidelines and—most importantly—fundamental aims and goals, I have trimmed anything that could be viewed as promotional from this article. It appears like puffery cherry-picked from mediocre-to-poor sources. I suggest that we discuss reintroduction of any of this content only on a case-by-case basis with good faith editors that do not have COIs in this area. — Bilorv (talk) 23:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Company Split![edit]

Collabera Holdings is now an umbrella company over Collabera LLC and Ascendion inc. Therefore, this page needs to be changed to Collabera LLC and the information here seems outdated. A new page also needs to be created for Ascendion inc. I don't know how to change the information myself so I'm reporting it here! Icedvanillalatte (talk) 20:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Icedvanillalatte: all of the information in Wikipedia needs to be reliably sourced, so that a reader can tell that it is not just made up. Could you provide some reliable sources that note the new information that needs to be incorporated into the article? (And feel free to try to make the changes yourself. If you butcher it, someone else can fix it. But, on Wikipedia, if you don't do it yourself then it generally doesn't get done.) — Bilorv (talk) 12:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]