Talk:City of Blinding Lights

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleCity of Blinding Lights is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 19, 2010.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 8, 2010Good article nomineeListed
January 27, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
February 28, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
July 31, 2010Good topic candidateNot promoted
Current status: Featured article

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Fair use rationale for Image:Cobl.jpg[edit]

Image:Cobl.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cobl.jpg[edit]

Image:Cobl.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:City of Blinding Lights/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Have had a read through, and while my initial thought was that the chart performance could use it's own section, I now think that it makes the article flow better to include it within Reception and Legacy like you have.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Overall a very well written and constructed article. References are precisely where they are needed, especially with the variety of quotes. Images have fair use rationales and alt text added. Article maintains neutral POV and uses quotes to show opinions of others. Happy to mark up as GA. Miyagawa (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Release date[edit]

I've just added Category:2004 songs to the article. Though I know that Category:2005 singles is already present, I've added it on the basis that while the single was released in 2005, the song itself was first unveiled in 2004. And that got me thinking; in the infobox, we list the runtimes for both the album version and the single edit. Should we do a similar thing for the release date? Something like "22 November 2004 (album)<br/>6 June 2005 (single)"? What do you think? Good idea or a bit too much? Melicans (talk, contributions) 08:07, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Having both categories is correct and standard practice, I should have spotted that. But in every case I know of, infoboxes for singles only list the release date of the single, not an earlier release date of the containing album. Readers can always click on the album link to find that out.
As for the different runtimes, I wasn't even aware they were different. Does the article explain what was cut out of the radio edit? That needs to be made clear, as well as which the timings in the article (10 seconds, 45 seconds, 1:20 in, etc.) pertain to. In the countries where this was a big hit, did radio stations play the cut version or the full version? Wasted Time R (talk) 14:07, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can add the first two points easily enough, but I don't think I can include anything for the latter; as far as I'm aware, that kind of thing isn't usually documented. Melicans (talk, contributions) 17:20, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, the article timings and what was cut have been clarified/added. Feel free to rearrange if it looks awkward! Melicans (talk, contributions) 18:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar to all[edit]

The Reviewers Award The Reviewers Award
This is a Barnstar for all who were involved in bringing "City of Blinding Lights" to featured article status. Whether you helped to build the article through content addition or copyedits, reviewed the article during GA, PR, or FAC, provided suggestions on what could be added or improved, or added images that helped to show what the article is about; this could not have happened without your combined efforts in creating the article that you see today. Thank you all; if you had any contribution, no matter how small, in making this article featured, then please consider this barnstar to be yours. Melicans (talk, contributions) 02:53, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Montreal Canadiens[edit]

I don't know if it's worth noting, and where to put it, but the Montreal Canadiens use this as their entrance song when they come on to the ice before every game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.83.121.24 (talk) 06:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Canadiens are a fairly notable team so it could possibly be put in the legacy section, but we will need a reliable source first. Melicans (talk, contributions) 14:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 FIFA World Cup[edit]

An excerpt of this song was used at the end of broadcasts of the 2010 FIFA World Cup on NBC (at least, I think it was NBC; it might have been ESPN), when they were about to go to commercials. Should this be in the "Legacy" section? 97.96.65.123 (talk) 01:40, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In a word, no. It's nowhere near notable enough.  f o x  01:53, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 29 external links on City of Blinding Lights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on City of Blinding Lights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:City_of_Blinding_Lights&oldid=1206703638"