Talk:Christine Jorgensen Reveals

Christine Jorgensen Reveals was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 22, 2024	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 8, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Christine Jorgensen Reveals is a docudrama about the first celebrity transsexual, who was called the world's most famous woman at the time?

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

I am unwatching this now, but I don't understand why it is up for GA. It is not quite C-class yet, IMO, as it is very incomplete and gives only a brief oveview of the show. This could go to peer review for more ideas about how to expand it. Just my opinion. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated it because it looked pretty clean. Based on the sparse sources, it is fairly complete, IMO. It may fail, but for breadth, but it may pass.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christine Jorgensen Reveals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121015022945/http://thephoenix.com/boston/arts/8760-pioneer-woman/ to http://thephoenix.com/boston/arts/8760-pioneer-woman/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Unsuccessful. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Christine Jorgensen Reveals/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 22:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This nomination was made as part of a mass nomination in order to obtain WikiCup points and it shows. Lead fails to summarize the article correctly; it also includes information not in the body. Background is written in a disorganized manner and lacks appropriate detail. Bradford Louryk, arguably the most important person in the article as the creator of the show, is introduced with zero context. Despite the fact that this article is about a play about the famous interview, all we know about the interview is that it was put onto an LP at some point. Description is inappropriately welded together from quotes. Performance history has no information since 2009 - is it still being performed? Who knows? Why is the rewards table colored like a parakeet? Why are some rewards in prose and not in the table? Images - is there an NFCC image of the playbill? What about pictures of Jorgensen or maybe Louryk?

QF as it is a long way from meeting the criteria for broadness and being well-written.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.