Talk:Christian Order

"excessive trivia and irrelevant praise [&] criticism"

The above is a quote from template:fansite, which I was tempted to add to this article. It is chock full of semi-random praise/criticism from mostly obscure sources. This is included because, well this is the only things people actually say about this magazine. Nobody bothers to describe or analyse it in any depth. The article may have survived its first AfD but, unless well-sourced substantive material is added, it is unlikely to survive its next one. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 04:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Recent edits, removal of tags

Given the large number of inline tags associated with citation problems this article has, removing the 'refimprove' is hardly warranted. Given the large number of cites to CO, its authors (particularly Davies) and fellow-traveller organisations, removal of the primarysources tag is likewise premature.

'Controversy' sections are against wikipedia guidelines, as are honorifics like Professor/Dr/Bishop/The Honorable before people's names (if you want to give context, include the person's job title -- Bishop of XXX for YYY church /Professor of XXX for YYY University/etc). Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 14:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Relevance?

Can somebody please explain to me the relevance of:

• A CO accusation that a bishop, in explicitly "off-the-record" (and therefore unverifiable) remarks, described CO unflatteringly. If it were verifiable that the bishop said it, it would be relevant, but all we have is that CO said that the bishop said it -- hearsay (particularly as it's unlikely that Pead was present when the bishop said it.
• Likewise, the claim by Pead about what "the new interim editor of London’s Catholic Herald" said. More hearsay.
• The actions of a group that CO is only affiliated to.

This is meant to be an encyclopaedia, not a gossip column -- so should be about what WP:RSs say about CO, not what they say about other groups, and what CO says other people have said about them. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 10:41, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Christian Order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514061547/http://sspx.agenda.tripod.com/id23.html to http://sspx.agenda.tripod.com/id23.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.angelusonline.org/print.php?sid=2976
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100717132655/http://www.ifuv.org/docs/michaeldavies_01.html to http://www.ifuv.org/docs/michaeldavies_01.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)