Talk:Chorzów

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

B-class review[edit]

Quickfail due to insufficient inline reference density. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Propaganda[edit]

The description of Chorzów´s "history" here is only the Polish view and mostly - propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.211.186.88 (talk) 13:20, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chorzów. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chorzów. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification[edit]

It should be made clear that there are two different 'Silesian Voivodeship's involved. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, three voivodeships (Slaskie, Opolskie, Dolnoslaskie), in Poland. Plus the Czech (southern) part and the little German part (in the west).

map[edit]

"Chorzów as Charzow on an 18th-century Polish map" Non-sens because in the 18th century Silesia wasn`t Polish. It would be better to use a German one.

die Heiducken[edit]

"Heiduck), which locally meant bandits." See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajduk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:20D0:E000:D0D1:1201:422A:EFA6 (talk) 13:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


"or adopted from the German/Polish/Silesian term for hajduk(s) (Polish (plural): Hajduki; German (singular): Heiduck), which locally meant bandits." No, "Heiducken" = Hungarian soldiers (for Austria). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.246.103.243 (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]