Talk:Choe Han-gi

Philosophy: Philosophers / Eastern / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Eastern philosophy
	Modern philosophy

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

A fact from Choe Han-gi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Choe Han-gi (pictured) published a theory that aimed to replace Newtonian mechanics with one based on qi?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Choe Han-gi.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 16:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Choe Han-gi

... that Choe Han-gi published a theory that aimed to replace Newtonian mechanics with one based on qi? Source: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43150781
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Maiden in the Tower
- Comment: Something's off with the image license. It's very likely old enough to be PD or sth, but not a recent work as currently indicated. If it can't be solved, possible quirky hook.

Created by Judokitty (talk). Nominated by LordPeterII (talk) at 16:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - One paragraph uncited.
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @LordPeterII: @Judokitty: Good article. There's just an uncited paragraph at the Newtonian mechanics and Western science sections that needs to be fixed. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onegreatjoke: Thanks for the review! That sentence sounds correct, but I can't find the corresponding info in the sources; I've simply commented it out for now. @Judokitty: Great article btw, for your first one! If you know where that sentence stems from, you can reference and re-add it. –LordPeterII (talk) 20:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onegreatjoke Is this fine now? SL93 (talk) 02:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to assume that this is fine now so I will approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:11, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]