Talk:Characters of the .hack franchise/Archive 1

Archive 1

Too Long?

Does this page really need to have separate links for every character in the entire series? Couldn't we condense it into one or two pages? We don't need 100+ pointless pages for this. --CRtwenty 05:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

And most of the character articles haven't been created yet. Especially in the "The World R:2" section. Putting all the articles in one page: it might be too long, but it's worth a try. Mickey0007 (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Merge character articles

I've proposed to merge Tri-Edge (.hack) into this article. Actually, most .hack character articles that I've come across should be merged here. Individually, they don't meet Wikipedia's notability criteria as found in Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). Merging the articles will help to prevent deletion. Pagrashtak 15:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

• Per the above, I have redirected all the character articles I reviewed since not one has asserted any real-world significance. The relevant policy discussion can be accessed at WP:FICT and WT:FICT contains a clear and explicit confirmation of the existing injunction against purely in-universe content. Interested editors should feel free to recreate any of these articles when they have attained and included the kinds of sources needed to substantiate real-world significance and provide a real-world focus. Remember, Wikipedia is not a fan site. There are better venues for fan-driven content than an encyclopedia. Eusebeus (talk) 22:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

"the above" was a request for a merge, not a mass redirect. I even see the phrase "help to prevent deletion". Now all that exist is a list of names, which is hardly informative. Shouldn't some discussion have taken place first, or an AfD even? Shiroi Hane (talk) 02:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

4 months have gone by and nothing has been done to redress those concerns. Feel free to add into the LOC suitable information on the individual characters. Standalone articles are simply not acceptable with the existing information. Eusebeus (talk) 04:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to have to revert you on this, Eusebeus. We need at least some of the content merged over, and it's a bad idea to have characters from all the games and different animes crammed into one page (though there are likely ones that are common enough to go on a general article like this). Merge tags and planning are in order, not blunt redirects. -- Ned Scott 06:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep in mind, I'm all for moving away from individual articles, but it's this kind of stuff that got us into the arbcom mess. -- Ned Scott 06:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

• Ned, if I can leave it in your hands, that's fine. You obviously know what the problems are here and these simply cannot remain as standalones, but I defer to your judgment on this wrt to timing. Eusebeus (talk) 13:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

• I'll do what I can. While I haven't played any of the games, I've seen most if not all of the different anime. -- Ned Scott 04:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

• Well, you well know our policies and you know that these clearly fail, but I'll defer to your suggestion for improvement for now. But they cannot remain as they are. that's clear. Eusebeus (talk) 04:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Plan of action

Here's what I'm thinking. First it needs to be figured out what lists are going to be made. One for .hack//SIGN, .hack//Liminality, Twilight, etc and then maybe a general one for highly shared characters? Then make a sandbox page for each list and do a raw merge of all the content. It's just a lot easier to pick and work at things like that, especially since a lot of us have limited time for individual tasks like this. After the sandbox pages are cleaned up (at least to a reasonable point) we move them in to the article space. Thoughts? -- Ned Scott 04:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

The List of .hack//Sign characters already exists, and if it's ok with you, I'll take care of merging the articles of at least the main characters into that list. Kazu-kun (talk) 04:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

That would be fine with me :) I also wouldn't be surprised if we did have enough info on at least some of these characters to warrant independent articles on them. Characters like Kite play a major role in several series. -- Ned Scott 05:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow, someone finally got moving on this on I missed it! No one's posted here in a few days—is this still ongoing? Pagrashtak 04:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

I'll leave the actual article space edits to Kazu-kun, but I might throw up some temp pages in a sand box for the time being, if only to throw some ideas out there. -- Ned Scott 05:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree with merging some of the shorter articles, like Tri-Edge (.hack), into the character lists, but others such as Rena Kunisaki and Tsukasa (.hack) have quite a bit of information on them. Merging those into a list would mean either removing a lot of information or having a huge messy list. Doesn't seem like a good idea. So my vote is merge the short ones, keep the long ones, and if anyone feels like expanding the short ones, put them back on their own pages. 75.155.19.100 (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

If you feel that Rena Kunisaki should have her own article, you should add reliable secondary sources to indicate Wikipedia:Notability. According to Wikipedia:Verifiability, "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." I haven't looked yet, but if no such sources can be found, the article cannot stand. Pagrashtak 21:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Being one of the main characters of a popular animé/manga series and having an 8KB article isn't enough? Anyway I'm not talking about Rena specifically, there are many characters with enough information that a merge would mean either throwing out that information or having a bloated page. That's not to say I'm opposed to merging at all, but merging everything... it's like merging every Simpsons character into one article vs having pages for characters that only appeared once or twice.

Anyway how do you add sources for facts about an animé character? Not like you can link to the scenes or pages of the book where these things are said. 75.155.19.100 (talk) 20:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

No, it's not enough. The size of the article is irrelevant—I could easily write an 8KB article about myself, but that wouldn't make me notable. Being a main character isn't enough by itself either, as notability is not inherited. Adding sources is easily—you look for significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. If it exists, add them as sources. If it does not exist, Wikipedia shouldn't have an article on it. Pagrashtak 21:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

If you had a cartoon about yourself, I'd say that WOULD make you notable, and I'd fully support your writing an 8k+ article on yourself. 208.245.87.2 (talk) 15:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

And I'd prod the article immediately, since anyone could appear in a self-made cartoon and then claim it grants them notability. Notability in that case would be established through the existence of reliable, third-party sources. —Dinoguy1000 21:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Poke poke? -- Ned Scott 05:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Possible splittings

Just throwing around some ideas in my head. Based on the articles that are still split, here's some possible splittings: (note: it's been a while since I've seen any of the anime, and I haven't played the video games before. Also, these splits might be an individual "list of character" type page, or it could be just folded into the parent article, like for AI buster.)

not sure

• Balmung (.hack)
• Cubia
• Elk (.hack)
• Helba
• Mia (.hack)
• Morganna Mode Gone
• Orca (.hack)
• Sanjuro (.hack)
• Skeith (.hack)

general

• Aura (.hack)
• BlackRose
• Kite (.hack)
• Harald Hoerwick

.hack//AI buster

• Albireo (.hack)

.hack//Sign

• BT (.hack)
• Bear (.hack)
• Crim (.hack)
• Silver Knight
• Mimiru
• Sora (.hack)
• Subaru (.hack)
• Tsukasa (.hack)

.hack//Legend of the Twilight

• Rena Kunisaki
• Shugo Kunisaki
• Zefie

-- Ned Scott 01:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

And there are other characters that we would mention that are not on the above list, simply because they don't have a dedicated page. -- Ned Scott 01:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I'll try to see if I can prod anyone about the "not sure" part, since this talk page seems pretty dead. After that I'll set up sandbox lists to work on. -- Ned Scott 05:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to try to improve some of these character articles over the next few days, just FYI. Rena Kunisaki (talk) 08:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

No problem. My above proposal would be just for a sandbox copy (for now) anyways, just to get a better idea of where we might go with this. -- Ned Scott 00:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

I've been gone for a while—any more progress on this? Pagrashtak 20:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you to TTN for finally getting some work done on this. The list is going to get pretty big pretty fast, so if anyone has any input on what possible list splittings there should be, please speak up. Like I said before, I don't know much about the games, so my above recommendation is about the best I've got so far. -- Ned Scott 08:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

it will be much easier to split it into two articles. list of project.hack series characters (or character of project.hack)

and list of .hack conglomerate (or characters of .hack conglomerate series) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.18.125.32 (talk) 05:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Balmung (.hack) should go in the Twilight list, although I don't know whether he has appeared anywhere else. Helba sort of made an appearance in Twilight, but she (?) was sort of the sender of this mysterious message in the end ("the daughter with the name of the western wind..."), I think. Should the Twilight character list be expanded? I read the manga, and I feel that there aren't that many main characters in Twilight; besides, the other character lists for the other .hack series are so extensive. Rotideypoc41352 (talk) 17:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

This article

this article is really unnecessary. we don't need to add the whole .hack characters into one, especially when they fall into separate timelines. The characters can fall into the main articles that introduces them.Bread Ninja (talk) 19:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Hum even if they are from different timeline, they bear some connection like Sora is also Haseo or WiseMan is Yata. And it's even more the case with .hack//Link which regroup characters from almost every .hack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.251.107.109 (talk) 00:00, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Split

There are a lot of things wrong with this article. But I'd say the main thing is that it's organized by in-universe details. Second, it's very difficult to pick out which characters go where. Because this list is so sloppy, most the game/anime/manga articles have their own lists already.

I would propose splitting this into lists organized by work. For example: GU would have a list, Twilight would have a list, Liminality would have a list etc. For the smaller lists, it would probably be more appropriate to just incorporate the info into their respective articles. For larger works like the two games series, a separate list would probably be appropriate. Lumping all the series' character together does nothing for organization. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:17, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Looks like there was a major merge by TTN last year that made the list like this. Before those merges it looked like this [[1]] which is a legitimate list-class article. Right now it's a bloated character article. I'd propose going back to something like that if we are to keep this article around, but split and trim the content. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Problem with splitting it is that it'll just be re-merged as .hack at its core is based on crossovers with each and every media. As it would be duplicating a lot of info, mostly plot, it would be remerged on those grounds.

Instead focus on reorganizing the current list and cutting out the trivial information like those lists of other characters which have nor real info and incorperate the possible important ones (ones that were playable characters for signifigant portion of at least 1 game, were central to the plot of at least 1 work, etc) into their own section. Then go and divide them by main character, secondary character, other characters (you can keep the distinction between the real-world and the game as its an important note). I say this rather than protagonist/antagonist because some protagonists become antagonists in different works. For example, Sora isn't really an a protagonist or antagonist in SIGN, but once he's absorbed he becomes one and in GU he is a protagonist.

That last leads to another problem. Ryu plays both Sora and Haseo. That's a lot of jumping around. It may be better to organize it as:

1. Real-world person
   1. Fragment character (if app)
   2. World character
   3. World character #2...

Only a subsection for the character if they have one. If they have the same character in 2 works, like Mirelle, then just put it all under the one character. Thoughts?陣内_Jinnai 17:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

That makes sense, but even if it is revealed that one offline person plays two different characters, they are usually two distinctly different characters; often we're not really given the name of the offline/real-life character, and when we are, it's really a trivial piece of information. Some cases like Salvatore Ayehara, the offline character is the central figure. But yeah, one person appearing as the same character in different works could just be listed once. At any rate. the main thing that bothers me about the list is the in-universe organization. Once it's in a more readable order we can work with content. Seems like I'm always stumbling upon these character lists. -_-

Speaking of Duplication, .hack//GU and .hack//roots both have extensive character lists in the main articles; as they are closely related, I imagine much of the useful information is duplicated. Many of the .hack articles do not link to this article either. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 10:48, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

First off, all of them should link to here and beyond a brief summary of the major characters in the article page more detailed explanation should be done in this page. I still believe some distinction between the real-world and the game should be done in the article as it on a different plane of existence and that some characters have dual roles in it.

It's hard to compare it to anything else out there because well, the franchise isn't like anything else out there. The game clearly and distinctly tries to divide the real-world from the game world in a manner that the two are separate planes of existence and treated as such.

For the reader that information is crucial to understanding not only from an in-universe perspective, but also from a real-world perspective such as the first .hack games which linked with the .hack anime that came with it. the visual styles between the two such as those in Sign that were commented on, etc.陣内_Jinnai 17:27, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Every .hack page that should link to this page now should have a link in the prose in the best place I could find.陣内_Jinnai 18:58, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Alright, let's go with your idea. Would you mind drawing up a brief outline here, at least for 1-2 characters so I can see what you have in mind? --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 19:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Examples

2 versions using trimmed versions of a completed Orca/Yasuhiko. The first divides them into two and has the advantage of keeping the real-world info separate from the game, but repeats stuff and looks kind of funny in some places. The latter integrates the two and has the advantage that everything can be placed into a seamless timeline, but the downside is to keep the real-world and game-world clear to the average reader the names are swapped around.

Since I'm not sure if we want a section for the Azure Knights, I added the info there. Not sure if it should be placed at the absolute bottom or not.陣内_Jinnai 00:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Orca

Real-world identity organization

===Yasuhiko=== Voiced by: Yasunori Masutani (Japanese); Kirk Thornton (English) Yasuhiko (ヤスヒコ) starts a fourteen-year-old Japanese boy who felt unsatisfied about his lack of any special talents. In May 2007, he came across the game Fragment decided to check it out. While doing so, he began to develop what his ideal version of himself as the character would be. In December that year the game known as The World (later The World: R1) launched and he immediately joined creating the character Orca (オルカ, Oruka). Later, after inviting his friend to play the game with him, Yasuhiko is placed into a coma when he is data drained why playing as Orca. After Yasuhiko recovers from the coma thanks to his friend's efforts, he and Balmug investigate the real-world for strange incidents involving The World that have been occurring. Eventually, Yasuhiko spots a cat-like character playing around some aromatic grass. ... Orca Orca is a male blademaster with blue armor and medium aquamarine tattoo who becomes famous in the game after becoming a high-level character and teaming up with Balmug to defeat One Sin, a special event enemy where he was given the title Orca of the Azure Sea (「蒼海のオルカ, Sōkai no Oruka), though he refused a special character avatar that was offered to him at the time. Orca's helpful and generous demeanor which he also extends to new players makes him well liked as well. After having his friend join the game, he is given the "Book of Twilight" by Aura because of his reputation. Almost immediately afterward, he is data drained by Skeith until Kite manages to help complete Aura. ... Orca's data, along with Kite's and Balmug's, is reused by in The World: R2 by Aura to create an A.I. character, Azure Orca, one of the three members of the Azure Knights. ...

Game-world identity organization

===Orca=== Voiced by: Yasunori Masutani (Japanese); Kirk Thornton (English) Orca (オルカ, Oruka) is the [[avatar (computing)|avatar] created by Yasuhiko as an idealized version of himself. When Yasuhiko was a fourteen-year-old Japanese boy, he felt unsatisfied about his lack of any special talents. In May 2007, he came across the game Fragment decided to test it out. It is while checking out the game he began to develop an idea for an ideal version of himself as a character. In December that year the game known as The World (later The World: R1) launched. Yasuhiko immediately joined and formed his idea into the character of Orca. Orca is a male blademaster with blue armor and medium aquamarine tattoo who becomes famous in the game after becoming a high-level character and teaming up with Balmug to defeat One Sin, a special event enemy where he was given the title Orca of the Azure Sea (「蒼海のオルカ, Sōkai no Oruka), though he refused a special character avatar that was offered to him at the time. Orca's helpful and generous demeanor which he also extends to new players makes him well liked as well. After having his friend join the game, he is given the "Book of Twilight" by Aura because of his reputation. Almost immediately afterword, he is data drained by Skeith and in the real-world Yasuhiko is placed into a coma until Kite manages to help complete Aura. After Yasuhiko recovers from the coma, thanks to Kite's efforts, he and Balmug investigate the real-world for strange incidents involving The World that have been occurring. Eventually, he spots a cat-like character playing around some aromatic grass. ... Orca's data, along with Kite's and Balmug's, is reused by in The World: R2 by Aura to create an A.I. character, Azure Orca, one of the three members of the Azure Knights. ...

this article is very confusing, it would be best to place each character on there own secion. each section being the game they were revealed. though yes the series does show some real world perspective, the series still follows the game's perspective more often. We can keep too different game characters separate and mention they are the same real world character.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

So you're suggesting each work having its own character list? Or perhaps combining character lists for related series? I agree, we still need to do something here. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 00:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Two Lists

thinking about it now, i don't think it's a good idea. there's still to consider characters from the novels, manga, and anime exclusive. So like i said before on your talk page, it would be great to split them to two character sections, one for project .hack and .hack conglomerate. If a characters have the same offline identity, then we just mention it in there character sectiosn for example:

Haseo (...) Haseo's real-world identity is Ryou Misaki who previously played Sora in .hack//Sign.

and another example if one or more characters appear in both projects we just say....

Endrance (...) he once was a character name Elk in .hack//(forgot which game introduces him).Bread Ninja (talk) 15:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Because lists are exempt from WP:SIZE there should be a compelling reason to do so as there will be merge attempts and so I'd suggest you make this proposal to both WT:Anime and WT:VG.陣内_Jinnai 23:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

I originally thought about about simply turning into two sections, but when i used the sandbox, i tried figuring out how to add a minor character section and a major character section without putting the characters on bullets.

another reason is that the list is far too confusing and is written in in-universe style (splitting one main cast and another by the world:R2) it's confusing to tell which one is the main characters. Both projects are considerably different. the two projects have an almost completely two different cast, both having major and minor characters. so that's why i proposed the split.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Just stopping by to remind you that a) the articles should be called "Characters of ____" rather than "List of ____ characters", and b)If you can't find any references for a certain section, I would recommend against splitting it into its own article until you can. Otherwise, the split sounds merited.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Actually, you're wrong. All anime characters aricles are "List of ____ characters" per WP:MOS-AM. WP:VG also asks that all list articles start with "List of". What guideline are you referring to? --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 22:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

That's the problem. These types of articles are not "lists", they are simply "articles". A list consists of links to other wiki pages as well as pertinent information. Since the characters do not have their own pages for the most part, the articles are not lists. At Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Character lists, we have assessed all the character 'lists' as articles, since if they are left simply as lists, they would be unencyclopedic for the aformentioned fact. As for WP:MOS-AM, I believe it needs to be revised to state this fact.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Immediately changing a guideline to support your argument[2] is not acceptable behavior on Wikipedia and is considered disruptive. Your preferred naming scheme was not part of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (video games), until you just added it after your comments here. As such, I have reverted your edit to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (video games) until you form a consensus. —Farix (t | c) 20:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Just because it's not List article, doesnt mean it cant have list in the title...and i doubt it's being unencyclopedic. i've seen articles that made it to GA-class that met similar style to this and having list in the title. Bread Ninja (talk) 20:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

These articles are very much in list format, so calling them lists is not out of the question. WP:ANIME has two featured character lists, List of Naruto characters and List of Tokyo Mew Mew characters. So classifying them as lists isn't a problem. —Farix (t | c) 20:47, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I'll also point out that WP:VG doesn't have a standard naming convention, unlike WP:ANIME. A look at what is in this category shows that there is no standard naming scheme were as lists in its anime and manga equivalent uses a very consistent naming scheme. —Farix (t | c) 21:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

So back on topic, what exactly do you mean by .hack congolomerate? I don't remember them using that term. I think they do divide the projects by the first set R1 and second R2. But then again, there are all the novels that don't really fit into either of those. Uguuh~! --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 07:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Well if you look see the .hack franchise article, it says the two projects are split into two projects. project .hack were the first 4 original games revolving around kite. the second project is called .hack conglomerate, it was also known as project G.U. for a while, but not so sure if that was a fan name. .hack conglomerate is the latest games about G.U. series.

well I'm not so sure about the novels, the way i have been looking at it, anything that revolves around the time of the first project belongs in that project, while all the other novels or manga that are in the same timeline as GU is .hack conglomerate.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:41, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

There is also the problem that the GU series uses characters from the original and not always in mere cameo roles. .hack//Link is suppose to bring back every character from the both series, including major uses from both.陣内_Jinnai 17:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I am aware of that, but not so sure that one is conglomerate, but since .hack//wiki says so and i haven't had time to check the .hack conglomerate website, then it's very likely it is part of .hack conglomerate. still, i think it's very possible to just simply mention them twice. the difference will be obvious when the plot relevance comes in. Bread Ninja (talk) 17:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I just checked .hack conglomerate official site. .hack link does not appear so i tihnk it's safe to not put .hack link characters along with .hack conglomerate.Bread Ninja (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Not so sure if we should just go by that? Link? Even if that is so, that doesn't automatically bunt it into the other list by default.陣内_Jinnai 22:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I didn't say we should put it in project.hack either, i suggest we just keep .hack//link out of the loop. Anyways, i question whether anime/manga/novel/ova should be entered. technically the projects only focus on the games. it would be great to move them to their respected articles.Bread Ninja (talk) 22:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

OK this is a layout i thought we could follow. the first two sections would be Main Characters and Minor Characters for both .hack conglomerate and project.hack characters (such as the ones that only appeared in the games and anime prequels) and then the third section would be Other, that being characters of novels, manga, and OVA original characters that were adapted to the two projects. what do you think?Bread Ninja (talk) 19:56, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Ok, i just checked the trailer of .hack//link and apparently it is part of conglomerate. still, it appeared as a compilation of trailers. But i checked .hack//wiki again and this time .hack//link does not appear in the conglomerate list.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good, so are we proposing two articles or two lists within this article? --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib)

two different articles, right now I'm not so sure anymore. I was hoping to only add those that were introduced, so any character that appears from a different project and appears again, will not be added because it was introduced in the original.Bread Ninja (talk) 22:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

OK, after a lot of thinking, and consideration, i realized that the projects aren't separated by universes, so character splitting by projects, wouldn't be the best idea. So i looked at some character articles to see if we can take the same idea, and then i ran into List of Mobile Suit Gundam 00 characters, and i thought, why not do it similar to that article.

this is a new article split we can do. list of .hack characters only holds the list of the first four .hack games (as you can see on .hack infection, mutation, outbreak, quarantine, they all have "part" in there title. so the title reads on the cover .hack part 1: infection) and the article separated into 3 sections Main Characters, Supporting Characters and other Characters (for characters that only appear in other media but still related to the .hack games). then we split the article to .hack//G.U. and apply the same sections. and until we get more information on .hack//Link, then we can make an article for that one too. I feel really confident about this proposalBread Ninja (talk) 18:16, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

So you'd organize two lists around the two game series? What about .hack//twilight, where would that fit in? --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 20:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

It relates to .hack, so it would still go in "other". it will also help us to see which characters never really were important enough to be kept in the list. so maybe we can remove a few. But those like .hack sign and .hack roots, those characters will be added in the main character-supporting characters section due to them mainly being connected to the main .hack games or .hack//G.U. games.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)