Talk:Chōsen Shinpō

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 11:06, May 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

edit
history
watch
purge

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Newspapers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Chōsen Shinpō appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 October 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the first newspaper in Korea, the Chōsen shinpō, was written in Japanese and Classical Chinese?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chōsen shinpō.

Wikipedia

On 1 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Chōsen shinpō to Chōsen Shinpō. The result of the discussion was moved.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 04:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the first newspaper in Korea, the Chōsen shinpō, was written in Japanese and Classical Chinese? Source: [1]. The claim about first newspaper is in the title of the paper. For second claim, page 687 The Chosen shinpo was also varied in content its most distinctive feature was that it was bilingual, with articles printed in Chinese and Japanese.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lenin–Stalinnin tugunun adaa-pile

Created by Toobigtokale (talk). Self-nominated at 00:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Chōsen shinpō; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

@Toobigtokale: Article is new and big enough (nice username by the way), and article matches hook. The article doesn't appear to have any issues outside of that. Your QPQ isn't completed, see WP:QPQ, so it doesn't count yet, but you've got 4 credits so I think I can accept that. I'm unable verify the sources as I can't speak Korean and also can't access the article on the Journal of Asian Studies, so I'll accept with good faith. —Panamitsu (talk) 22:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the review! And yes I was happy when I saw nobody had taken the username! toobigtokale (talk) 22:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

im not gonna make a bold edit on a DYK article, so I'll ask your opinion(s) first[edit]

Should we add the kana for chōsenshinpō (ちょうせんしんぽう), or {{ruby-ja}} it as 朝鮮新法（ちょうせんしんぽう）? DarmaniLink (talk) 16:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please go ahead with the edit! I agree it would be helpful toobigtokale (talk) 01:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 February 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 15:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chōsen shinpō → Chōsen Shinpō – I made this article, but am unsure of this, so please help. I can't find anything in the MOS about this, but most pages for Japanese newspapers seem to use title casing and not sentence casing. I think in academia, it's common practice to use sentence casing for transliterated publications, but I'm at a loss as to what to do. Maybe WP:COMMONNAME applies, but idk if there is a common name for this publication as it's relatively obscure. toobigtokale (talk) 01:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support I’m not so sure of the policy either, but I don’t see anything wrong with following the precedent on Wikipedia. I also personally think it makes more sense to use title casing for proper nouns, but that’s just me. Dantus21 (talk) 12:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.