Talk:Central West End, St. Louis

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

St. Louis High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis (Neighborhoods), a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Third-largest urban park?[edit]

It's not the third largest park at all! Swope Park, in the larger neighboring big city in Missouri, Kansas City, is about 1,900 acres-- making it bigger than Forest Park. This statistic is wrong and I am removing it.

Off the top of my head, I can think of three urban parks that are larger:

Franklin Mountains State Park in El Paso, Texas: 24,247.56 acres
South Mountain Park in Phoenix, AZ: 16,283 acres
Memorial Park, Houston, Texas: 1,466 acres

There may even be more, but it appears that Forest Park is not the third largest. Ufwuct 00:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are in fact more parks in the U.S. that are larger than Forest Park.[1] Ufwuct 00:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't compare state parks to city parks, it defeats you. DaronDierkes (talk) 01:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To Do List[edit]

Please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject St. Louis/articles to find out how to improve this page.

The comment about Tony LaRussa probably needs to be fixed. He retired. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.160.98.31 (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brandy Avenue?[edit]

I'm not sure what this should be, but I know it ain't this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.35.171.75 (talk) 12:33, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Central West End, St. Louis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://stlcin.missouri.org/alderman/neighald.cfm?NeighNum=38
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051210071128/http://www.explorestlouis.com:80/neighborhoods/cwe.asp?PageType=4 to http://www.explorestlouis.com/neighborhoods/cwe.asp?PageType=4
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080801174855/http://www.cweresidence.com:80/ to http://www.cweresidence.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV template added[edit]

Howdy fellow Wikipedians, I went ahead and added a NPOV section template to the geography section as much of the information there seems outright promotional for the neighborhood without citation. Most concerning was the uncited proposition that "the building boom shows no sign of slowing down," which is an observation that, without citation, falls short of encyclopedic merit to say the least. Other info such as the "unique atmosphere" also seems overly promotional and really does not belong in an encyclopedic entry on this area. I might clean this up in the coming weeks myself if no one else gets around to it first, but adding the template seems like a good first step. Cheers! Jake (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The changes you suggest are exactly those which any editor can do, so I'm sure your edits would be gratefully noted by all of us. Best wishes & thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]