Talk:Carya glabra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article should state explicitly that it incorporates text from the public domain and the source. Ialso can't find the public domain disclosure statement on the Silvics manual, the location of this should also be noted, and a link to the original should be included. KP Botany 18:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put the information in the edit summary as I find that a more secure and accurate pactice for the long-term. If you prefer using templates or something go ahead. This is really four degrees away from my main preoject so I doubt I will be editing the article and I encourage you to format it for your preference.--BirgitteSB 23:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh, yes, that's a good idea. However, it should go in the article, too, so that the reader is not led to think this is original writing from Wikipedia. I cannot find the PD disclosure on this document, either. Could you post a link directly to the PC disclosure? Nice try at getting me to format it to my preferences, but I still haven't figured out how to even format a date yet on Wikipedia. I will ask one of the other botany folks to do it when you post the PD disclosure link, and they'll be glad to, as it's incredibly useful having this information and resource. Thanks for alerting us to this resource. KP Botany 23:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I ahve no idea what you mean by a PD disclosure link, and I am quite used to dealing with copyright issues. This is from Agriculture

Handbook 654 (Silvics of Forest Trees of the United States, 1965, revised: December 1990) and is work of the US Govt. printed at U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. The Acknowledgements reads:

Everyone works for different USDA departments which means they work for the US federal goverment, so this work is not eligable for copyright according the the US Constituion.--BirgitteSB 00:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

PD=Public Domain. This should cover it, as the work was created as a project for the federal government. I will ask the other botany folks to simply create a template that can added to this and other pages with the reference and disclaimer rather than adding it to each one. It would have been fine, though, to just post a link to this, as the link is also needed for the template--I will find it, when I get a moment. Thanks. KP Botany 00:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I used the existing Template:USGovernment. I could see the case for one which is similar but has fields for title, publisher, date, etc (like Template:cite book or Template:cite web). Or I suppose we could just make one for the Silvics manual (I guess maybe that isn't so strange given that it might provide text for a lot of pages). Kingdon 07:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Kingdon, good work on the article. If you know how to make one, I think it would be a great idea. KP Botany 20:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]